Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The inversion statistic in derangements and in other permutations with a prescribed number of fixed points

Ross G. Pinsky

TL;DR

The work analyzes how the inversion statistic in a random permutation shifts when conditioning on a fixed-point structure, providing exact formulas for the mean and for fixed-point order probabilities under $P_n^{(k)}$. Using a Chinese restaurant process construction, the authors derive precise expressions for $E_n^{(k)}I_n$ and $P_n^{(k)}(\sigma_i^{-1}<\sigma_j^{-1})$ across all $k$, revealing a threshold at $k=1$ with a $+\tfrac{1}{12}$ correction and a linear-in-$n$ bias for $k=0$ and $k\ge2$. In particular, derangements ($k=0$) yield $E_n^{(0)}I_n=\frac{n(n-1)}{4}+\frac{n}{6}+\frac{1}{12}+O\left(\frac{1}{(n-1)!}\right)$, while for $k\ge2$, $E_n^{(k)}I_n=\frac{n(n-1)}{4}-\frac{k-1}{6}n-\frac{k^2-k-1}{12}+O\left(\frac{1}{(n-k)!}\right)$. The results illuminate how fixed-point constraints modulate inversion structure and connect fixed-point Poisson-$(1)$ behavior to inversion counts, with proofs relying on a CR-based, consistent permutation construction.

Abstract

We study how the inversion statistic is influenced by fixed points in a permutation. %The expected number of inversions in a uniformly random permutation in $S_n$ is $\frac{n(n-1)}4$. For each $n\in\mathbb{N}$, and each $k\in\{0,1,\cdots, n\}$, let $P_n^{(k)}$ denote the uniform probability measure on the set of permutations in $S_n$ with exactly $k$ fixed points. We obtain an exact formula for the expected number of inversions under the measure $P_n^{(k)}$ as well as for $P_n^{(k)}(σ^{-1}_i<σ^{-1}_j)$, for $1\le i<j\le n$, the $P_n^{(k)}$-probability that the number $i$ precedes the number $j$. In particular, up to a super-exponentially small correction as $n\to\infty$, the expected number of inversions in a random derangement $(k=0)$ is $\frac16n+\frac1{12}$ more than the value $\frac{n(n-1)}4$ that one obtains for a uniformly random general permutation in $S_n$. On the other hand, up to a super-exponentially small correction, for $k\ge2$, the expected number of inversions in a random permutation with $k$ fixed points is $\frac{k-1}6n+\frac{k^2-k-1}{12}$ less than $\frac{n(n-1)}4$. In the borderline case, $k=1$, up to a super-exponentially small correction, the expected number of inversions in a random permutation with one fixed point is $\frac1{12}$ more than $\frac{n(n-1)}4$. The proofs make strategic and perhaps novel use of the Chinese restaurant construction for a uniformly random permutation.

The inversion statistic in derangements and in other permutations with a prescribed number of fixed points

TL;DR

The work analyzes how the inversion statistic in a random permutation shifts when conditioning on a fixed-point structure, providing exact formulas for the mean and for fixed-point order probabilities under . Using a Chinese restaurant process construction, the authors derive precise expressions for and across all , revealing a threshold at with a correction and a linear-in- bias for and . In particular, derangements () yield , while for , . The results illuminate how fixed-point constraints modulate inversion structure and connect fixed-point Poisson- behavior to inversion counts, with proofs relying on a CR-based, consistent permutation construction.

Abstract

We study how the inversion statistic is influenced by fixed points in a permutation. %The expected number of inversions in a uniformly random permutation in is . For each , and each , let denote the uniform probability measure on the set of permutations in with exactly fixed points. We obtain an exact formula for the expected number of inversions under the measure as well as for , for , the -probability that the number precedes the number . In particular, up to a super-exponentially small correction as , the expected number of inversions in a random derangement is more than the value that one obtains for a uniformly random general permutation in . On the other hand, up to a super-exponentially small correction, for , the expected number of inversions in a random permutation with fixed points is less than . In the borderline case, , up to a super-exponentially small correction, the expected number of inversions in a random permutation with one fixed point is more than . The proofs make strategic and perhaps novel use of the Chinese restaurant construction for a uniformly random permutation.
Paper Structure (3 sections, 2 theorems, 76 equations)

This paper contains 3 sections, 2 theorems, 76 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $n\ge3$. Then i. ii.

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2