Self-moderation in the decentralized era: decoding blocking behavior on Bluesky
Carlo Bono, Nick Liu, Giuseppe Russo, Francesco Pierri
TL;DR
Self-moderation on Bluesky investigates blocking dynamics in a decentralized network using a three-month public Firehose dataset to build 86-feature profiles of user activity, content, and network interactions. The study applies clustering, binary classification, and regression to predict being blocked and to identify informative predictors, finding that high activity correlates with more blocks and that graph-centrality features (e.g., Degree, Coreness) alongside engagement signals strongly predict blocking, achieving ROC AUC up to $0.88$ at higher blocking thresholds. SHAP analyses reveal that a small subset of features can match performance, suggesting potential for lightweight, privacy-preserving moderation aids, while AutoML-based regression yields $R^2$ around $0.48$ for estimating block counts. Overall, the work demonstrates the feasibility and value of data transparency for studying moderation in decentralized social networks and informs the design of safety tools that respect user autonomy.
Abstract
Moderation and blocking behavior, both closely related to the mitigation of abuse and misinformation on social platforms, are fundamental mechanisms for maintaining healthy online communities. However, while centralized platforms typically employ top-down moderation, decentralized networks rely on users to self-regulate through mechanisms like blocking actions to safeguard their online experience. Given the novelty of the decentralized paradigm, addressing self-moderation is critical for understanding how community safety and user autonomy can be effectively balanced. This study examines user blocking on Bluesky, a decentralized social networking platform, providing a comprehensive analysis of over three months of user activity through the lens of blocking behaviour. We define profiles based on 86 features that describe user activity, content characteristics, and network interactions, addressing two primary questions: (1) Is the likelihood of a user being blocked inferable from their online behavior? and (2) What behavioral features are associated with an increased likelihood of being blocked? Our findings offer valuable insights and contribute with a robust analytical framework to advance research in moderation on decentralized social networks.
