Beyond the Mirror: Personal Analytics through Visual Juxtaposition with Other People's Data
Sungbok Shin, Sunghyo Chung, Hyeon Jeon, Hyunwook Lee, Minje Choi, Taehun Kim, Jaehoon Choi, Sungahn Ko, Jaegul Choo
TL;DR
The paper addresses how personal analytics can be enriched by placing an individual's calendar data in a comparative context with others. It introduces CalTrend, a visual analytics system that uses deidentified online schedule logs, life-mode labeling, and ML-driven insights (via t-SNE projections and topic modeling) to contrast individuals and groups. Through a qualitative study with two domain experts, the authors show that domain-specific mental models shape interpretations and enable identification of meaningful groups or anomalies, suggesting practical utility for cross-domain personal analytics and targeted insights. Privacy considerations and limited generalizability are acknowledged, with future work pointing to broader datasets and additional domains to strengthen generalizability and impact.
Abstract
An individual's data can reveal facets of behavior and identity, but its interpretation is context dependent. We can easily identify various self-tracking applications that help people reflect on their lives. However, self-tracking confined to one person's data source may fall short in terms of objectiveness, and insights coming from various perspectives. To address this, we examine how those interpretations about a person's data can be augmented when the data are juxtaposed with that of others using anonymized online calendar logs from a schedule management app. We develop CALTREND, a visual analytics system that compares an individuals anonymized online schedule logs with using those from other people. Using CALTREND as a probe, we conduct a study with two domain experts, one in information technology and one in Korean herbal medicine. We report our observations on how comparative views help enrich the characterization of an individual based on the experts' comments. We find that juxtaposing personal data with others' can potentially lead to diverse interpretations of one dataset shaped by domain-specific mental models.
