Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Inference for max-linear Bayesian networks with noise

Mark Adams, Kamillo Ferry, Ruriko Yoshida

TL;DR

This work extends max-linear Bayesian networks (MLBNs) to settings with multiplicative noise on a known DAG and analyzes parameter estimation in log-space via tropical geometry. It develops two complementary inference approaches: (i) a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) framework with the EM algorithm to estimate edge-log weights $\omega_{ij}$, typically taking $\hat{\omega}_{ij} = \min_k \{\mu_k\}$, and (ii) a geometric, polytrope-based method that fits hyperplane boundaries to recover $\omega_{ij}$ through a quadratic program. The study reveals that the GMM estimator can be inconsistent under tail dependency or when edge-specific observations are scarce, while the tropical/hyperplane method remains robust in these regimes; a key finding is a threshold on edge-specific sample size below which GMM estimators fail. The results provide practical guidance for causal inference in extreme-value settings and lay groundwork for further tropical-estimation theory and extensions to more complex graph structures. Overall, the paper contributes two principled estimation pathways for MLBNs with noise, advancing reliable inference for extreme-event causality."

Abstract

Max-Linear Bayesian Networks (MLBNs) provide a powerful framework for causal inference in extreme-value settings; we consider MLBNs with noise parameters with a given topology in terms of the max-plus algebra by taking its logarithm. Then, we show that an estimator of a parameter for each edge in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) is distributed normally. We end this paper with computational experiments with the expectation and maximization (EM) algorithm and quadratic optimization.

Inference for max-linear Bayesian networks with noise

TL;DR

This work extends max-linear Bayesian networks (MLBNs) to settings with multiplicative noise on a known DAG and analyzes parameter estimation in log-space via tropical geometry. It develops two complementary inference approaches: (i) a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) framework with the EM algorithm to estimate edge-log weights , typically taking , and (ii) a geometric, polytrope-based method that fits hyperplane boundaries to recover through a quadratic program. The study reveals that the GMM estimator can be inconsistent under tail dependency or when edge-specific observations are scarce, while the tropical/hyperplane method remains robust in these regimes; a key finding is a threshold on edge-specific sample size below which GMM estimators fail. The results provide practical guidance for causal inference in extreme-value settings and lay groundwork for further tropical-estimation theory and extensions to more complex graph structures. Overall, the paper contributes two principled estimation pathways for MLBNs with noise, advancing reliable inference for extreme-event causality."

Abstract

Max-Linear Bayesian Networks (MLBNs) provide a powerful framework for causal inference in extreme-value settings; we consider MLBNs with noise parameters with a given topology in terms of the max-plus algebra by taking its logarithm. Then, we show that an estimator of a parameter for each edge in a directed acyclic graph (DAG) is distributed normally. We end this paper with computational experiments with the expectation and maximization (EM) algorithm and quadratic optimization.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 3 theorems, 31 equations, 10 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 23 sections, 3 theorems, 31 equations, 10 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Lemma 2.5

Let $i\neq j\in V(G)$ be distinct nodes of the underlying graph $G$. Then, the random variable $Y_{ij}$ has an atom at $\omega_{kj} - \omega_{ki}$ for every common ancestor $k$ and these are the only atoms. In particular, if $i$ is an ancestor of $j$, then there is an atom at $\omega_{ij}$.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: A DAG consisting of four vertices. Each vertex $i$ in the network represents a random variable $X_i$ in the joint distribution of a random vector $X=(X_1, X_2, X_3, X_4)$.
  • Figure 2: This curated network provides the basis for our analysis throughout the paper. The unique combinations of directed edges creates triangles, diamonds, and max-weighted paths that create challenges in parameter estimation.
  • Figure 3: Graph structures our network integrates to examine parameter estimation in combination and isolation.
  • Figure 4: A max-linear Bayesian network on 4 nodes with $N = 2000$ along with the density plot of $Y_{24}$ and the marginal plot of $Y_{14}$ vs. $Y_{24}$. These visualizations provide insights into the effectiveness of our methodology, naming the application of GMM and the geometric of the associated polytrope.
  • Figure 5: Density plot of $Y_{24}$ from Example \ref{['ex:GMM']} together with uncertainty of assigning observations to one of the $K$ components of the Gaussian mixture. Assignment uncertainty is maximized at the meeting of two mixtures.
  • ...and 5 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (17)

  • Example 1.1
  • Remark 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5: GKL:2019
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • ...and 7 more