Table of Contents
Fetching ...

GDI-Bench: A Benchmark for General Document Intelligence with Vision and Reasoning Decoupling

Siqi Li, Yufan Shen, Xiangnan Chen, Jiayi Chen, Hengwei Ju, Haodong Duan, Song Mao, Hongbin Zhou, Bo Zhang, Bin Fu, Pinlong Cai, Licheng Wen, Botian Shi, Yong Liu, Xinyu Cai, Yu Qiao

TL;DR

GDI-Bench addresses the need for robust evaluation of multimodal document understanding by decoupling visual complexity and reasoning complexity into V0-V2 and R0-R2, respectively, and by grading difficulty across 19 tasks in 9 scenarios. The authors introduce Layer-wise Adaptive Freeze-Tuning (LW-AFT) to mitigate catastrophic forgetting during supervised fine-tuning and propose a GDI-Model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on GDI-Bench and other benchmarks. The benchmark combines 2.3k images with a two-layer annotation pipeline (OmniDocBench and in-house data) and a mixed-data generation strategy (GPT-4o plus rule-based tasks) to yield 3,660 test cases with rigorous quality control. The work demonstrates meaningful weaknesses in current models at higher reasoning levels and shows that LW-AFT can preserve generalization while enabling domain-specific improvements, with code and models released on HuggingFace for open community use.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has profoundly impacted the document domain, creating a wide array of application scenarios. This progress highlights the need for a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate these models' capabilities across various document-specific tasks. However, existing benchmarks often fail to locate specific model weaknesses or guide systematic improvements. To bridge this gap, we introduce a General Document Intelligence Benchmark (GDI-Bench), featuring 2.3k images across 9 key scenarios and 19 document-specific tasks. By decoupling visual complexity and reasoning complexity, the GDI-Bench structures graded tasks that allow performance assessment by difficulty, aiding in model weakness identification and optimization guidance. We evaluate various open-source and closed-source models on GDI-Bench, conducting decoupled analyses in the visual and reasoning domains, revealing their strengths and weaknesses. To address the diverse tasks and domains in the GDI-Bench, we propose a GDI-Model that mitigates catastrophic forgetting during the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) process through an intelligence-preserving training strategy, thereby reinforcing the inherent weaknesses of the base model. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on previous benchmarks and the GDI-Bench. Both our benchmark and models are or will be open-sourced on https://huggingface.co/GDIBench.

GDI-Bench: A Benchmark for General Document Intelligence with Vision and Reasoning Decoupling

TL;DR

GDI-Bench addresses the need for robust evaluation of multimodal document understanding by decoupling visual complexity and reasoning complexity into V0-V2 and R0-R2, respectively, and by grading difficulty across 19 tasks in 9 scenarios. The authors introduce Layer-wise Adaptive Freeze-Tuning (LW-AFT) to mitigate catastrophic forgetting during supervised fine-tuning and propose a GDI-Model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on GDI-Bench and other benchmarks. The benchmark combines 2.3k images with a two-layer annotation pipeline (OmniDocBench and in-house data) and a mixed-data generation strategy (GPT-4o plus rule-based tasks) to yield 3,660 test cases with rigorous quality control. The work demonstrates meaningful weaknesses in current models at higher reasoning levels and shows that LW-AFT can preserve generalization while enabling domain-specific improvements, with code and models released on HuggingFace for open community use.

Abstract

The rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has profoundly impacted the document domain, creating a wide array of application scenarios. This progress highlights the need for a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate these models' capabilities across various document-specific tasks. However, existing benchmarks often fail to locate specific model weaknesses or guide systematic improvements. To bridge this gap, we introduce a General Document Intelligence Benchmark (GDI-Bench), featuring 2.3k images across 9 key scenarios and 19 document-specific tasks. By decoupling visual complexity and reasoning complexity, the GDI-Bench structures graded tasks that allow performance assessment by difficulty, aiding in model weakness identification and optimization guidance. We evaluate various open-source and closed-source models on GDI-Bench, conducting decoupled analyses in the visual and reasoning domains, revealing their strengths and weaknesses. To address the diverse tasks and domains in the GDI-Bench, we propose a GDI-Model that mitigates catastrophic forgetting during the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) process through an intelligence-preserving training strategy, thereby reinforcing the inherent weaknesses of the base model. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on previous benchmarks and the GDI-Bench. Both our benchmark and models are or will be open-sourced on https://huggingface.co/GDIBench.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 7 equations, 17 figures, 8 tables)

This paper contains 29 sections, 7 equations, 17 figures, 8 tables.

Figures (17)

  • Figure 1: Overview of GDI-Bench. The benchmark decouples document understanding complexity into visual complexity (V0-V2) and reasoning complexity (R0-R2) dimensions, creating a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing MLLMs' capabilities across various document types and reasoning tasks. Queries marked with a “CN” tag originate in Chinese and have been translated into English using Google Translate.
  • Figure 1: Complexity Distribution in the GDI Benchmark.
  • Figure 2: Performance of various open-source and closed-source models on GDI-Bench at different levels of reasoning complexity. The GDI-Model is fine-tuned based on the InternVL3-8B model.
  • Figure 3: Distribution of visual complexity scores across nine document categories as reported in the OmniDocBench. The SOTA performance results from the benchmark show a substantial gap between document types, providing empirical justification for our visual complexity taxonomy.
  • Figure 4: Annotation Process of GDI-Bench.
  • ...and 12 more figures