Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Optimality and stability of the radial shapes for the Sobolev trace constant

Simone Cito

TL;DR

The paper addresses optimality and stability of Sobolev trace constants for the p-Laplacian on bounded domains, proving that the ball maximizes the trace constant \\sigma_{p,q}(\\Omega) among convex domains with fixed perimeter and providing a quantitative deficit tied to the Hausdorff asymmetry. It develops a rearrangement-based, web-function method to obtain sharp isoperimetric-type bounds and extends these ideas to domains with holes, proving that the spherical shell maximizes the exterior trace constant \\tilde{\\sigma}_{p,q} under outer-perimeter and volume constraints, with a stability estimate governed by a novel hybrid asymmetry that couples outer boundary and hole geometry. The analysis relies on variational characterizations, the theory of quermassintegrals, quantitative Aleksandrov-Fenchel inequalities, and careful treatment of inner parallel sets and web-functions. The results offer quantitative shape-optimization insights for nonlinear Sobolev trace inequalities and have implications for related Robin–Neumann spectral problems with negative boundary parameters.

Abstract

In this work we establish the optimality and the stability of the ball for the Sobolev trace operator $W^{1,p}(Ω)\hookrightarrow L^q(\partialΩ)$ among convex sets of prescribed perimeter for any $1< p <+\infty$ and $1\le q\le p$. More precisely, we prove that the trace constant $σ_{p,q}$ is maximal for the ball and the deficit is estimated from below by the Hausdorff asymmetry. With similar arguments, we prove the optimality and the stability of the spherical shell for the Sobolev exterior trace operator $W^{1,p}(Ω_0\setminus\overlineΘ)\hookrightarrow L^q(\partialΩ_0)$ among open sets obtained removing from a convex set $Ω_0$ a suitably smooth open hole $Θ\subset\subsetΩ_0$, with $Ω_0\setminus\overlineΘ$ satisfying a volume and an outer perimeter constraint.

Optimality and stability of the radial shapes for the Sobolev trace constant

TL;DR

The paper addresses optimality and stability of Sobolev trace constants for the p-Laplacian on bounded domains, proving that the ball maximizes the trace constant \\sigma_{p,q}(\\Omega) among convex domains with fixed perimeter and providing a quantitative deficit tied to the Hausdorff asymmetry. It develops a rearrangement-based, web-function method to obtain sharp isoperimetric-type bounds and extends these ideas to domains with holes, proving that the spherical shell maximizes the exterior trace constant \\tilde{\\sigma}_{p,q} under outer-perimeter and volume constraints, with a stability estimate governed by a novel hybrid asymmetry that couples outer boundary and hole geometry. The analysis relies on variational characterizations, the theory of quermassintegrals, quantitative Aleksandrov-Fenchel inequalities, and careful treatment of inner parallel sets and web-functions. The results offer quantitative shape-optimization insights for nonlinear Sobolev trace inequalities and have implications for related Robin–Neumann spectral problems with negative boundary parameters.

Abstract

In this work we establish the optimality and the stability of the ball for the Sobolev trace operator among convex sets of prescribed perimeter for any and . More precisely, we prove that the trace constant is maximal for the ball and the deficit is estimated from below by the Hausdorff asymmetry. With similar arguments, we prove the optimality and the stability of the spherical shell for the Sobolev exterior trace operator among open sets obtained removing from a convex set a suitably smooth open hole , with satisfying a volume and an outer perimeter constraint.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 24 theorems, 156 equations, 3 figures)

This paper contains 14 sections, 24 theorems, 156 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

Let $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ be a measurable set, $f:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}$ be a Lipschitz function and let $u:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}$ be a measurable function. Then,

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: $\mathcal{A}_\mathcal{H}(\Omega_0)$ is drawn in orange; the green set is the integration domain in the definition of $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}(\Theta;\Omega_0)$.
  • Figure 2: The darker green set is the actual integration domain in the definition of $\tilde{\mathcal{A}}(\Theta;\Omega_0)$.
  • Figure 3: The blue set on the left is clearly more symmetric than the blue set on the right. The hybrid asymmetry recognizes their difference; nevertheless their canonical Hausdorff and Fraenkel distances from the gray spherical shell are the same.

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Coarea formula
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Proposition 2.4
  • Proposition 2.5: DoTo, Theorem 2
  • Remark 2.6: further radial cases
  • Proposition 2.7
  • Proposition 2.8
  • proof
  • Remark 2.9: Immediate geometric upper bounds
  • ...and 39 more