Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Brief Review for Compression and Transfer Learning Techniques in DeepFake Detection

Andreas Karathanasis, John Violos, Ioannis Kompatsiaris, Symeon Papadopoulos

TL;DR

The paper tackles edge deployment of deepfake detection by integrating model compression and transfer learning to reduce computation and training needs. It systematically evaluates pruning, knowledge distillation, quantization, fine tuning, and adapters across three diverse datasets, showing that high compression can preserve accuracy when training and testing come from the same DeepFake model. A key finding is that knowledge distillation often matches or surpasses other methods, even at aggressive compression levels, but domain generalization degrades when test data come from unseen DeepFake generators. This highlights a practical limitation for real world use and motivates future work on improving cross generator robustness alongside compression techniques.

Abstract

Training and deploying deepfake detection models on edge devices offers the advantage of maintaining data privacy and confidentiality by processing it close to its source. However, this approach is constrained by the limited computational and memory resources available at the edge. To address this challenge, we explore compression techniques to reduce computational demands and inference time, alongside transfer learning methods to minimize training overhead. Using the Synthbuster, RAISE, and ForenSynths datasets, we evaluate the effectiveness of pruning, knowledge distillation (KD), quantization, fine-tuning, and adapter-based techniques. Our experimental results demonstrate that both compression and transfer learning can be effectively achieved, even with a high compression level of 90%, remaining at the same performance level when the training and validation data originate from the same DeepFake model. However, when the testing dataset is generated by DeepFake models not present in the training set, a domain generalization issue becomes evident.

A Brief Review for Compression and Transfer Learning Techniques in DeepFake Detection

TL;DR

The paper tackles edge deployment of deepfake detection by integrating model compression and transfer learning to reduce computation and training needs. It systematically evaluates pruning, knowledge distillation, quantization, fine tuning, and adapters across three diverse datasets, showing that high compression can preserve accuracy when training and testing come from the same DeepFake model. A key finding is that knowledge distillation often matches or surpasses other methods, even at aggressive compression levels, but domain generalization degrades when test data come from unseen DeepFake generators. This highlights a practical limitation for real world use and motivates future work on improving cross generator robustness alongside compression techniques.

Abstract

Training and deploying deepfake detection models on edge devices offers the advantage of maintaining data privacy and confidentiality by processing it close to its source. However, this approach is constrained by the limited computational and memory resources available at the edge. To address this challenge, we explore compression techniques to reduce computational demands and inference time, alongside transfer learning methods to minimize training overhead. Using the Synthbuster, RAISE, and ForenSynths datasets, we evaluate the effectiveness of pruning, knowledge distillation (KD), quantization, fine-tuning, and adapter-based techniques. Our experimental results demonstrate that both compression and transfer learning can be effectively achieved, even with a high compression level of 90%, remaining at the same performance level when the training and validation data originate from the same DeepFake model. However, when the testing dataset is generated by DeepFake models not present in the training set, a domain generalization issue becomes evident.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 3 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Evaluation of Compression Techniques Using a Dataset Combining Deepfake Images from Synthbuster and Authentic Images from RAISE
  • Figure 2: Evaluation of Compression Techniques Using ForenSynths dataset
  • Figure 3: Evaluation of Transfer Learning Techniques Using ForenSynths dataset