Opinion-Driven Decision-Making for Multi-Robot Navigation through Narrow Corridors
Norah K. Alghamdi, Shinkyu Park
TL;DR
This work tackles deadlock risk in multi-robot traversal through a narrow corridor under decentralized coordination. It introduces an opinion-driven framework based on Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics (NOD) that allows robots to infer others’ intentions from observed motions and to converge on a shared passing strategy, guided by a softmax-based strategy selection and implemented via a multi-robot path planner and MPC. To scale to larger robot teams, the authors propose a game reduction technique that limits the number of game players considered by each robot, framed within a generalized NOD model, and a conflict-based method to select those players. Through extensive simulations with 2–4 robots, the approach achieves high success rates, demonstrates robustness to initial conditions and biases, and shows substantial computational savings from game reduction, making decentralized social navigation through narrow corridors feasible in practice. The work lays a foundation for future human-robot and data-driven parameter-tuning extensions, including implicit signaling and experimental validation with human participants.
Abstract
We propose an opinion-driven navigation framework for multi-robot traversal through a narrow corridor. Our approach leverages a multi-agent decision-making model known as the Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics (NOD) to address the narrow corridor passage problem, formulated as a multi-robot navigation game. By integrating the NOD model with a multi-robot path planning algorithm, we demonstrate that the framework effectively reduces the likelihood of deadlocks during corridor traversal. To ensure scalability with an increasing number of robots, we introduce a game reduction technique that enables efficient coordination in larger groups. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
