Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On One Application of Asphericity of Presentations

Maxim Zykin

TL;DR

This work addresses torsion in the group $\mathfrak{F}/[\mathfrak{M},\mathfrak{N}]$ arising from RC and combinatorially aspherical (CA) presentations. It provides a concise purely algebraic proof of Kulikova's Lemma 3(a) by leveraging the relation-module decomposition from Chiswell–Collins–Huebschmann, showing that $\mathfrak{N}/[\mathfrak{F},\mathfrak{N}]$ is a free abelian central subgroup with basis given by the images of the defining relators, which makes the extension $1 \to \mathfrak{N}/[\mathfrak{F},\mathfrak{N}] \to \mathfrak{F}/[\mathfrak{M},\mathfrak{N}] \to \mathfrak{G}$ torsion-free. The approach avoids geometric tools like spherical pictures and van Kampen diagrams, relying instead on an algebraic decomposition of the relation module. Consequently, the results imply that HNN-extensions and amalgamated free products built from CA presentations preserve CA and torsion-freeness, providing useful structural and cohomological consequences for groups presented with CA relations.

Abstract

I present a direct proof of Lemma 3(a) from O. V. Kulikova's work on torsion in the group $F/[M,N]$, using only Proposition 1.2 of Chiswell-Collins-Huebschmann on combinatorially aspherical presentations. In particular, I show that if two presentations satisfy the RC condition and are combinatorially aspherical, then the quotient $N/[F,N]$ is free abelian on the defining relators and central in $F/[F,N]$, whence the extension $F/[M,N]$ is torsion-free.

On One Application of Asphericity of Presentations

TL;DR

This work addresses torsion in the group arising from RC and combinatorially aspherical (CA) presentations. It provides a concise purely algebraic proof of Kulikova's Lemma 3(a) by leveraging the relation-module decomposition from Chiswell–Collins–Huebschmann, showing that is a free abelian central subgroup with basis given by the images of the defining relators, which makes the extension torsion-free. The approach avoids geometric tools like spherical pictures and van Kampen diagrams, relying instead on an algebraic decomposition of the relation module. Consequently, the results imply that HNN-extensions and amalgamated free products built from CA presentations preserve CA and torsion-freeness, providing useful structural and cohomological consequences for groups presented with CA relations.

Abstract

I present a direct proof of Lemma 3(a) from O. V. Kulikova's work on torsion in the group , using only Proposition 1.2 of Chiswell-Collins-Huebschmann on combinatorially aspherical presentations. In particular, I show that if two presentations satisfy the RC condition and are combinatorially aspherical, then the quotient is free abelian on the defining relators and central in , whence the extension is torsion-free.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 2 theorems, 15 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 2 theorems, 15 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 4

The subgroup is a free abelian group with basis $\{r+[\mathfrak{F},\mathfrak{N}]\mid r\in R\}$ and is central in $\mathfrak{F}/[\mathfrak{F},\mathfrak{N}]$. Consequently, the extension is torsion-free.

Theorems & Definitions (11)

  • Definition 1: RC condition
  • Definition 2: Relation module
  • Definition 3: Combinatorial asphericity (CA)
  • Lemma 4: Kulikova Kulikova2024
  • Proposition 5: Chiswell--Collins--Huebschmann CCH1981
  • Definition 6: Augmentation and Coinvariants
  • Claim 7: Triviality of the Module Action
  • proof
  • Claim 8: Centrality
  • proof
  • ...and 1 more