Analysis of Multiple-try Metropolis via Poincaré inequalities
Rocco Caprio, Sam Power, Andi Q. Wang
TL;DR
This paper studies the Multiple-try Metropolis algorithm through Poincaré inequalities by recasting MTM as an auxiliary-variable resampling approximation to an ideal Metropolis–Hastings kernel. It establishes an $L^2$ Dirichlet-form comparison between the ideal kernel $P_ abla$ and MTM $P_n$ that depends on moments of the importance weights, enabling non-asymptotic convergence bounds in Gaussian targets. A key finding is that using globally balanced weights causes the spectral gap to vanish as the number of proposals grows, whereas locally balanced weights yield positive spectral gaps with favorable dimension scaling, including an explicit $d^{-1/2}$ bound in the Gaussian case and an optimal diffusion-like scaling $ abla \, ext{like } d^{-1/4}$. Collectively, these results provide practical guidance on weight choices for MTM and offer a rigorous framework for comparing MTM variants to ideal MH, with potential extensions to broader strongly log-concave targets.
Abstract
We study the Multiple-try Metropolis algorithm using the framework of Poincaré inequalities. We describe the Multiple-try Metropolis as an auxiliary variable implementation of a resampling approximation to an ideal Metropolis--Hastings algorithm. Under suitable moment conditions on the importance weights, we derive explicit Poincaré comparison results between the Multiple-try algorithm and the ideal algorithm. We characterize the spectral gap of the latter, and finally in the Gaussian case prove explicit non-asymptotic convergence bounds for Multiple-try Metropolis by comparison.
