Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Baryogenesis in Conformally Flat Spacetimes

Felix Finster, Marco van den Beld-Serrano

TL;DR

This work extends a causal-fermion-systems baryogenesis mechanism from Minkowski space to conformally flat spacetimes by introducing a regularizing timelike vector field $u$ and a symmetrized Hamiltonian $A_t$ that drives locally rigid spinor dynamics. Through a perturbative spectral calculus in $ ext{Δ}A(t)=A_t- ilde{H}_{ ilde{η}}$, the authors derive a leading second-order expression for the baryogenesis rate $B_t^{(2)}$ that depends on the conformal factor $ ext{Ω}$, the particle mass $m$, and the regularizing field $u$, with the kernel $G_{ ext{Ω},m,u}$ encoding the geometric and dynamical data. They show $B_t^{(0)}=B_t^{(1)}=0$ under general conditions and analyze two key scenarios: a trivial regularization $u=∂_t$ where baryogenesis vanishes for massless states and reduces to specific $ ext{Ω}$-dependent form for $m≠0$, and a general $u$ where multiple operator contributions yield a richer, nonzero second-order rate even when $m=0$. The results provide a rigorous framework for quantitative predictions in cosmological spacetimes (FLRW, Milne, Milne-like) and pave the way for confronting the mechanism with the observed baryon asymmetry in the early universe.

Abstract

Based on a baryogenesis mechanism originating from the theory of causal fermion systems, we analyze its main geometric and analytic features in conformally flat spacetimes. An explicit formula is derived for the rate of baryogenesis in these spacetimes, which depends on the mass $m$ of the particles, the conformal factor $Ω$ and a future directed timelike vector field $u$ (dubbed the regularizing vector field). Our analysis covers Friedmann-Lema{î}tre-Robertson-Walker, Milne and Milne-like spacetimes. It sets the ground for concrete, quantitative predictions for specific cosmological spacetimes.

Baryogenesis in Conformally Flat Spacetimes

TL;DR

This work extends a causal-fermion-systems baryogenesis mechanism from Minkowski space to conformally flat spacetimes by introducing a regularizing timelike vector field and a symmetrized Hamiltonian that drives locally rigid spinor dynamics. Through a perturbative spectral calculus in , the authors derive a leading second-order expression for the baryogenesis rate that depends on the conformal factor , the particle mass , and the regularizing field , with the kernel encoding the geometric and dynamical data. They show under general conditions and analyze two key scenarios: a trivial regularization where baryogenesis vanishes for massless states and reduces to specific -dependent form for , and a general where multiple operator contributions yield a richer, nonzero second-order rate even when . The results provide a rigorous framework for quantitative predictions in cosmological spacetimes (FLRW, Milne, Milne-like) and pave the way for confronting the mechanism with the observed baryon asymmetry in the early universe.

Abstract

Based on a baryogenesis mechanism originating from the theory of causal fermion systems, we analyze its main geometric and analytic features in conformally flat spacetimes. An explicit formula is derived for the rate of baryogenesis in these spacetimes, which depends on the mass of the particles, the conformal factor and a future directed timelike vector field (dubbed the regularizing vector field). Our analysis covers Friedmann-Lema{î}tre-Robertson-Walker, Milne and Milne-like spacetimes. It sets the ground for concrete, quantitative predictions for specific cosmological spacetimes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 12 theorems, 125 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $(M,g)$ be a conformally flat spacetime with time coordinate $t$ as in confmink. Moreover, assume that the operator $A_t$ has an absolutely continuous spectrum, that $\Delta A(t)$ has smooth and compactly supported coefficients (in $N_{t}$) and that for all $\omega$ in the resolvent set of $A_t$ (where $R_{\omega}(\tilde{H}_\eta) := (\tilde{H}_\eta - \omega)^{-1}$ denotes the resolvent). Then,

Theorems & Definitions (33)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5: Locally rigid dynamics of $u$
  • Definition 2.6: Locally rigid operator
  • Proposition 2.7
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.8
  • ...and 23 more