Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Cybernetic Governance in a Coliving House

Daniel Kronovet, Seth Frey, Joseph DeSimone

TL;DR

This paper investigates sustaining regenerative labor in a co-living commons without managers by implementing cybernetic governance inspired by Ostrom's design principles. It presents Chore Wheel, a Slack-based suite with three mechanisms—Chores (continuous-auction, dynamic prioritization), Hearts (norm-tracking ledger), and Things (adaptive procurement)—that turn human sensing, machine bookkeeping, and real-time feedback into a distributed governance tool. In an $18$-month field study at Sage House with $9$ bedrooms and occupancy at $98$%, the system achieved low leadership burden and documented engagement patterns such as kitchen-task prioritization and broad participation in Things. Findings suggest such tooling can sustain reliable commons governance in online communities and distributed collectives, offering a transferable design palette for online communities and coliving and other digitally mediated collectives. The work also highlights ongoing questions about interface design, balance between human and machine cognition, and the role of in-person processes.

Abstract

We report an 18-month field experiment in distributed digital institutions: a nine-bedroom Los Angeles coliving house that runs without managers, while sustaining 98% occupancy and below-market rents. Drawing on Elinor Ostrom's commons theory, we outline design principles and three digital mechanisms that form the institutional core: 1) A continuous-auction chore scheduler turns regenerative labor into a time-indexed points market; residents meet a 100-point monthly obligation by claiming tasks whose value rises linearly with neglect. 2) A pairwise-preference layer lets participants asynchronously reprioritize tasks, translating meta-governance into low-cognition spot inputs. 3) A symbolic "hearts" ledger tracks norm compliance through automated enforcement, lightweight challenges, and peer-awarded karma. Together, these mechanisms operationalize cybernetic principles--human sensing, machine bookkeeping, real-time feedback--while minimizing dependence on privileged roles. Our exploratory data (567 chore claims, 255 heart events, and 551 group purchases) show that such tooling can sustain reliable commons governance without continuous leadership, offering a transferable design palette for online communities, coliving houses, and other digitally mediated collectives.

Cybernetic Governance in a Coliving House

TL;DR

This paper investigates sustaining regenerative labor in a co-living commons without managers by implementing cybernetic governance inspired by Ostrom's design principles. It presents Chore Wheel, a Slack-based suite with three mechanisms—Chores (continuous-auction, dynamic prioritization), Hearts (norm-tracking ledger), and Things (adaptive procurement)—that turn human sensing, machine bookkeeping, and real-time feedback into a distributed governance tool. In an -month field study at Sage House with bedrooms and occupancy at %, the system achieved low leadership burden and documented engagement patterns such as kitchen-task prioritization and broad participation in Things. Findings suggest such tooling can sustain reliable commons governance in online communities and distributed collectives, offering a transferable design palette for online communities and coliving and other digitally mediated collectives. The work also highlights ongoing questions about interface design, balance between human and machine cognition, and the role of in-person processes.

Abstract

We report an 18-month field experiment in distributed digital institutions: a nine-bedroom Los Angeles coliving house that runs without managers, while sustaining 98% occupancy and below-market rents. Drawing on Elinor Ostrom's commons theory, we outline design principles and three digital mechanisms that form the institutional core: 1) A continuous-auction chore scheduler turns regenerative labor into a time-indexed points market; residents meet a 100-point monthly obligation by claiming tasks whose value rises linearly with neglect. 2) A pairwise-preference layer lets participants asynchronously reprioritize tasks, translating meta-governance into low-cognition spot inputs. 3) A symbolic "hearts" ledger tracks norm compliance through automated enforcement, lightweight challenges, and peer-awarded karma. Together, these mechanisms operationalize cybernetic principles--human sensing, machine bookkeeping, real-time feedback--while minimizing dependence on privileged roles. Our exploratory data (567 chore claims, 255 heart events, and 551 group purchases) show that such tooling can sustain reliable commons governance without continuous leadership, offering a transferable design palette for online communities, coliving houses, and other digitally mediated collectives.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Chore Wheel interface examples. Figure \ref{['fig:chores']} shows chore claims being verified in a shared communications channel. Figure \ref{['fig:hearts']} shows the public "hearts board" for all residents. Figure \ref{['fig:things']} shows an excerpt from the Things purchasing flow.
  • Figure 2: Total performances by chore type for 2023 (n=567). Figure \ref{['fig:chore-performances']} shows kitchen-related tasks absorbing roughly 1/3 of the total points. Figure \ref{['fig:chore-performances-2']} shows "Wash Dishes" is a unique chore, absorbing the plurality of points despite a low average performance value.
  • Figure 3: Normalized monthly chore performances for two residents over three months. We see how, without explicit organization, resident U04B4U (left) self-sorts into common-area tasks, while U04FN6 (right) self-sorts into kitchen tasks. Normalization accounts for differences in total points per month caused by time out-of-town.
  • Figure 4: Cumulative Hearts values for residents over 12 months (n=255). We see hearts reflecting both high-engagement behaviors resulting in bonus hearts, as well as low-engagement behaviors resulting in loss of hearts. The fading of bonus hearts was introduced in October 2023, and the rate of fading was reduced in April 2024.
  • Figure 5: Things purchasing behaviors (n=551). Figure \ref{['fig:things-balances']} shows account balances over 6 months, revealing savings behavior in some accounts and not others. Named accounts were introduced in Spring 2024. Figure \ref{['fig:things-buyers']} shows per-resident purchases during the same period, revealing a heavy-tailed power-law distribution.