Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Strict contactomorphisms are scarce

Yong-Geun Oh, Yasha Savelyev

Abstract

The notion of non-projectible contact forms on a given compact manifold $M$ is introduced by the first-named author in [Ohb], the set of which he also shows is a residual subset of the set of (coorientable) contact forms, both in the case with a fixed contact structure and in the case without it. In this paper, we prove that for any non-projectible contact form $λ$ the set, denoted by $\text{\rm Cont}^{\text{\rm st}}(M,λ)$, consisting of strict contactomorphisms of $λ$ is a a countable disjoint union of real lines $\mathbb R$, one for each connected component.

Strict contactomorphisms are scarce

Abstract

The notion of non-projectible contact forms on a given compact manifold is introduced by the first-named author in [Ohb], the set of which he also shows is a residual subset of the set of (coorientable) contact forms, both in the case with a fixed contact structure and in the case without it. In this paper, we prove that for any non-projectible contact form the set, denoted by , consisting of strict contactomorphisms of is a a countable disjoint union of real lines , one for each connected component.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 34 theorems, 231 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

The set of strict contact pairs, i.e., $(\lambda,\psi)$ satisfying the equation eq:strict-contact is a (Frechet) smooth submanifold of where $\operatorname{Diff}(M, \mu_\lambda)$ is the set of volume-preserving diffeomorphisms of the volume form $\mu_\lambda = \lambda \wedge (d\lambda)^n$.

Theorems & Definitions (64)

  • Theorem 1.1: Theorem \ref{['thm:Phi-submersion']}
  • Example 1.2
  • Lemma 1.3
  • Definition 1.4: Nonprojectible contact form
  • Theorem 1.5: Theorem 1.6 & 1.10 oh:nonprojectible
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Corollary 1.7
  • Definition 1.9
  • Definition 1.10
  • Remark 1.11
  • ...and 54 more