Table of Contents
Fetching ...

One pathogen does not an epidemic make: A review of interacting contagions, diseases, beliefs, and stories

Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Antoine Allard, Vittoria Colizza, Jessica W. Crothers, Peter Sheridan Dodds, Mirta Galesic, Fakhteh Ghanbarnejad, Dominique Gravel, Ross A. Hammond, Kristina Lerman, Juniper Lovato, John J. Openshaw, S. Redner, Samuel V. Scarpino, Guillaume St-Onge, Timothy R. Tangherlini, Jean-Gabriel Young

TL;DR

The paper argues that contagions—biological pathogens, social memes, beliefs, and stories—interact across hosts, environments, and cognitive systems, invalidating the siloed approach of studying them in isolation. It synthesizes insights from the physics of interacting contagions, social contagion data, belief dynamics, and ecological perspectives to show how synergy, competition, and multi-scale coupling shape epidemic and information-diffusion outcomes. It highlights key mechanisms such as synergistic transmission, multilayer and higher-order interactions, and narrative networks, and discusses challenges in inferring interactions from partial data while stressing the need for unified, interdisciplinary frameworks. By proposing an ecosystem view of contagions and calling for data-integrative, theory-informed approaches, the work aims to improve understanding and forecasting of complex, real-world spreading processes and to bridge social and biological perspectives.

Abstract

From pathogens and computer viruses to genes and memes, contagion models have found widespread utility across the natural and social sciences. Despite their success and breadth of adoption, the approach and structure of these models remain surprisingly siloed by field. Given the siloed nature of their development and widespread use, one persistent assumption is that a given contagion can be studied in isolation, independently from what else might be spreading in the population. In reality, countless contagions of biological and social nature interact within hosts (interacting with existing beliefs, or the immune system) and across hosts (interacting in the environment, or affecting transmission mechanisms). Additionally, from a modeling perspective, we know that relaxing these assumptions has profound effects on the physics and translational implications of the models. Here, we review mechanisms for interactions in social and biological contagions, as well as the models and frameworks developed to include these interactions in the study of the contagions. We highlight existing problems related to the inference of interactions and to the scalability of mathematical models and identify promising avenues of future inquiries. In doing so, we highlight the need for interdisciplinary efforts under a unified science of contagions and for removing a common dichotomy between social and biological contagions.

One pathogen does not an epidemic make: A review of interacting contagions, diseases, beliefs, and stories

TL;DR

The paper argues that contagions—biological pathogens, social memes, beliefs, and stories—interact across hosts, environments, and cognitive systems, invalidating the siloed approach of studying them in isolation. It synthesizes insights from the physics of interacting contagions, social contagion data, belief dynamics, and ecological perspectives to show how synergy, competition, and multi-scale coupling shape epidemic and information-diffusion outcomes. It highlights key mechanisms such as synergistic transmission, multilayer and higher-order interactions, and narrative networks, and discusses challenges in inferring interactions from partial data while stressing the need for unified, interdisciplinary frameworks. By proposing an ecosystem view of contagions and calling for data-integrative, theory-informed approaches, the work aims to improve understanding and forecasting of complex, real-world spreading processes and to bridge social and biological perspectives.

Abstract

From pathogens and computer viruses to genes and memes, contagion models have found widespread utility across the natural and social sciences. Despite their success and breadth of adoption, the approach and structure of these models remain surprisingly siloed by field. Given the siloed nature of their development and widespread use, one persistent assumption is that a given contagion can be studied in isolation, independently from what else might be spreading in the population. In reality, countless contagions of biological and social nature interact within hosts (interacting with existing beliefs, or the immune system) and across hosts (interacting in the environment, or affecting transmission mechanisms). Additionally, from a modeling perspective, we know that relaxing these assumptions has profound effects on the physics and translational implications of the models. Here, we review mechanisms for interactions in social and biological contagions, as well as the models and frameworks developed to include these interactions in the study of the contagions. We highlight existing problems related to the inference of interactions and to the scalability of mathematical models and identify promising avenues of future inquiries. In doing so, we highlight the need for interdisciplinary efforts under a unified science of contagions and for removing a common dichotomy between social and biological contagions.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 2 figures, 1 table.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of the dynamics of interacting contagions. A: Schematic representation of two synergistic contagions (blue and orange) spreading synergistically through a network. Co-infections, shown in pink, are needed to sustain the contagion and are aided by clustering. B: Phase transition of various types of contagions. While independent contagions display continuous transitions, synergistic contagions can build up transmission potential, which leads to discontinuous transitions reminiscent of physical systems where latent heat accumulates. C: Growth rate of synergistic (pink), independent (black), and antagonistic (green) contagions. Synergistic contagions tend to grow super-exponentially since they get more likely to interact as they spread further.
  • Figure 2: A post about religious exemption to vaccination requirements, "A friend of my daughter got her 'shots' for this one and now has multiple health issues. Anxiety attacks, rashes, and a lot of fatigue. My girl is not getting them. No way…" can be represented as an interaction subgraph between concepts of the broader discussion forum, which comprises thousands of interlocking stories and story parts.