Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Intervals without primes near an iterated linear recurrence sequence

Kota Saito

TL;DR

This work studies intervals around iterated inhomogeneous linear recurrence sequences (ILRS) and proves that, under explicit reversibility and growth conditions on the composing sequences $R_j(n)$, the intervals $\big(|f(n)|-c\log n, |f(n)|+c\log n\big)$ contain no primes for infinitely many $n$, where $f(n)=(R_0\;∘\;⋯\;∘\;R_M)(n)$ and $c$ depends only on the recurrence orders. The authors establish modular-periodicity lemmas for ILRS modulo primes, extend them to iterated compositions, and leverage a PNT-type estimate to force divisibility by carefully chosen primes along arithmetic progressions, yielding infinite prime-void windows with a quantified error term. A corollary shows that for any Pisot or Salem number $α$, the numbers $\lfloor α^{(R_1\;∘\;⋯\;∘\;R_M)(n)} \rfloor$ are composite for infinitely many $n$, by expressing the floor as a sum of an ILRS component and a bounded trace term. The results also recover and extend earlier work (D1, D2) in the base case $M=0$ and provide explicit constants for the size of the prime-free intervals.

Abstract

Let $M$ be a fixed positive integer. Let $(R_{j}(n))_{n\ge 1}$ be a linear recurrence sequence for every $j=0,1,\ldots, M$, and we set $f(n)=(R_0\circ \cdots \circ R_M)(n)$, where $(S\circ T)(n)= S(T(n))$. In this paper, we obtain sufficient conditions on $(R_{0}(n))_{n\ge 1},\ldots, (R_{M}(n))_{n\ge 1}$ so that the intervals $(|f(n)|-c\log n, |f(n)|+c\log n)$ do not contain any prime numbers for infinitely many integers $n\ge 1$, where $c$ is an explicit positive constant depending only on the orders of $R_0,\ldots, R_M$. As a corollary, we show that if for each $j=1,2,\ldots, M$, the sequence $(R_j(n))_{n\ge 1}$ is positive, strictly increasing, and the constant term of its characteristic polynomial is $\pm 1$, then for every Pisot or Salem number $α$, the numbers $\lfloor α^{(R_1\circ \cdots \circ R_M)(n)} \rfloor $ are composite for infinitely many integers $n\ge 1$.

Intervals without primes near an iterated linear recurrence sequence

TL;DR

This work studies intervals around iterated inhomogeneous linear recurrence sequences (ILRS) and proves that, under explicit reversibility and growth conditions on the composing sequences , the intervals contain no primes for infinitely many , where and depends only on the recurrence orders. The authors establish modular-periodicity lemmas for ILRS modulo primes, extend them to iterated compositions, and leverage a PNT-type estimate to force divisibility by carefully chosen primes along arithmetic progressions, yielding infinite prime-void windows with a quantified error term. A corollary shows that for any Pisot or Salem number , the numbers are composite for infinitely many , by expressing the floor as a sum of an ILRS component and a bounded trace term. The results also recover and extend earlier work (D1, D2) in the base case and provide explicit constants for the size of the prime-free intervals.

Abstract

Let be a fixed positive integer. Let be a linear recurrence sequence for every , and we set , where . In this paper, we obtain sufficient conditions on so that the intervals do not contain any prime numbers for infinitely many integers , where is an explicit positive constant depending only on the orders of . As a corollary, we show that if for each , the sequence is positive, strictly increasing, and the constant term of its characteristic polynomial is , then for every Pisot or Salem number , the numbers are composite for infinitely many integers .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 8 theorems, 45 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.3

Let $M$ be a non-negative integer, and let $(R_j(n))_{n\geq 1}$ be an ILRS with order $d_j\ge 1$ for every $j=0,1,\ldots,M$. We suppose that where we only suppose Condition3:Thm1 when $M=0$. Let $H$ be an arbitrary positive integer. Then, there exists a positive integer $m_0$ such that for each $m\ge m_0$, we find a collection of (not necessarily distinct) prime numbers $p_h$, where $h=-H, \ldots

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • Remark 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • ...and 8 more