Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the action of the cactus group on the set of Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns for orthogonal Lie algebras

Igor Svyatnyy

TL;DR

The paper constructs a natural cactus group action on the indexing sets of Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns for orthogonal Lie algebras by realizing $S^{\otimes N}$, with $S$ the spinor representation of $\frak{o}_{2n}$, as a module under $O_N\times \frak{o}_{2n}$ via Howe duality. Central to the approach are the regular cell diagrams $D^N_{\lambda}$, which biject with highest weights $\Delta^N$, and the bijection with short Young diagrams $\nu$ that encode the $O_N$-module structure of multiplicity spaces $U_{\lambda}$. Three complementary bases index these spaces: the principal basis $\mathcal{PR}(U_{\lambda})$, the GT-basis $GT(U_{\lambda})$, and the GT-patterns $\mathfrak{GT}(U_{\lambda})$, with natural bijections linking their indexing sets via regular cell tables $\mathfrak{Ctab}(D^N_{\lambda})$ and semi-standard short Young tableaux $SSSYT(\nu)$. By transporting the crystal commutor through these bijections, the cactus group $C_N$ acts on regular cell tables, hence on Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns and related tableaux, laying groundwork for explicit descriptions of the action and its combinatorial reflection. This framework unifies representation-theoretic multiplicities, combinatorial cell diagrams, and crystal-theoretic coboundary structures to produce a coherent, actionable picture of cactus-group symmetries in the orthogonal GT setting.

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to define a natural action of the cactus group on the set of Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns for orthogonal Lie algebras. These Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns are meant to index the Gelfand-Tsetlin basis in the irreducible representations of the orthogonal Lie algebra $\mathfrak{o}_N$ with respect to the chain of nested orthogonal Lie algebras $\mathfrak{o}_N \supset \mathfrak{o}_{N-1} \supset \ldots \supset \mathfrak{o}_3$. Using the Howe duality between $O_N$ and $\mathfrak{o}_{2n}$, we realize some representations of $\mathfrak{o}_N$ as multiplicity spaces inside the tensor power of the spinor representation $(Λ\mathbb{C}^{n})^{\otimes N}$. There is a natural choice of the basis inside the multiplicity space, which agrees with the decomposition of $(Λ\mathbb{C}^{n})^{\otimes N}$ into simple $\mathfrak{o}_{2n}$-modules. We call such basis principal. The action of the cactus group $C_N$ by the crystal commutors on the crystal arising from $(Λ\mathbb{C}^{n})^{\otimes N}$ induces the action of $C_N$ on the set indexing the principal basis inside the multiplicity space. We call this set regular cell tables. Regular cell tables are the analog of semi-standard Young tables. There is a natural bijection between a specific subset of semi-standard Young tables and regular cell tables. In this paper, we establish a natural bijection between the principal basis and the Gelfand-Tsetlin basis and, therefore, define an action of the cactus group on the set Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns.

On the action of the cactus group on the set of Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns for orthogonal Lie algebras

TL;DR

The paper constructs a natural cactus group action on the indexing sets of Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns for orthogonal Lie algebras by realizing , with the spinor representation of , as a module under via Howe duality. Central to the approach are the regular cell diagrams , which biject with highest weights , and the bijection with short Young diagrams that encode the -module structure of multiplicity spaces . Three complementary bases index these spaces: the principal basis , the GT-basis , and the GT-patterns , with natural bijections linking their indexing sets via regular cell tables and semi-standard short Young tableaux . By transporting the crystal commutor through these bijections, the cactus group acts on regular cell tables, hence on Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns and related tableaux, laying groundwork for explicit descriptions of the action and its combinatorial reflection. This framework unifies representation-theoretic multiplicities, combinatorial cell diagrams, and crystal-theoretic coboundary structures to produce a coherent, actionable picture of cactus-group symmetries in the orthogonal GT setting.

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to define a natural action of the cactus group on the set of Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns for orthogonal Lie algebras. These Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns are meant to index the Gelfand-Tsetlin basis in the irreducible representations of the orthogonal Lie algebra with respect to the chain of nested orthogonal Lie algebras . Using the Howe duality between and , we realize some representations of as multiplicity spaces inside the tensor power of the spinor representation . There is a natural choice of the basis inside the multiplicity space, which agrees with the decomposition of into simple -modules. We call such basis principal. The action of the cactus group by the crystal commutors on the crystal arising from induces the action of on the set indexing the principal basis inside the multiplicity space. We call this set regular cell tables. Regular cell tables are the analog of semi-standard Young tables. There is a natural bijection between a specific subset of semi-standard Young tables and regular cell tables. In this paper, we establish a natural bijection between the principal basis and the Gelfand-Tsetlin basis and, therefore, define an action of the cactus group on the set Gelfand-Tsetlin patterns.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 46 theorems, 260 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The action of $O_N(\mathbb{C})$ on $S^{\otimes N}$ commutes with the action of $\mathfrak{o}_{2n}(\mathbb{C})$ and $S^{\otimes N}$ under the joint action of $O_N(\mathbb{C})$ and $\mathfrak{o}_{2n}(\mathbb{C})$ decomposes into direct sum of irreducible representations without multiplicities: where each $U_\lambda$ is an irreducible (holomorphic) representation of $O_N(\mathbb{C})$ and each $L_\la

Theorems & Definitions (87)

  • Theorem
  • Theorem
  • Proposition
  • Corollary
  • Proposition
  • Proposition
  • Corollary
  • Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • ...and 77 more