Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Boundary $q$-characters of evaluation modules for split quantum affine symmetric pairs

Jian-Rong Li, Tomasz Przezdziecki

TL;DR

This work constructs and analyzes evaluation modules for affine quantum symmetric pair coideal subalgebras of split type ${ m AI}$, using Lu–Wang’s Drinfeld-type presentation and a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis to compute the spectrum of the Lu–Wang Cartan subalgebra. It proves an evaluation homomorphism via braid-group action and derives explicit boundary $q$-character formulas for evaluation modules, with a tableaux interpretation that mirrors normal $q$-characters but reveals extra symmetry. The authors show that boundary $q$-characters satisfy a Nakajima-like highest-weight property in this setting and identify genuinely new structures not arising from restriction of ordinary $q$-characters. The results bridge GT-pattern combinatorics with boundary eigenvalues, enabling concrete computations of classical and non-classical boundary characters and providing tools for further exploration of boundary phenomena in quantum symmetric pairs.

Abstract

We study evaluation modules for quantum symmetric pair coideal subalgebras of affine type $\mathsf{AI}$. By computing the action of the generators in Lu and Wang's Drinfeld-type presentation on Gelfand-Tsetlin bases, we determine the spectrum of a large commutative subalgebra arising from the Lu-Wang presentation. This leads to an explicit formula for boundary analogues of $q$-characters in the setting of quantum affine symmetric pairs. We interpret this formula combinatorially in terms of semistandard Young tableaux. Our results imply that boundary $q$-characters share familiar features with ordinary $q$-characters - such as a version of the highest weight property - yet they also display new phenomena, including an extra symmetry. In particular, we provide the first examples of boundary $q$-characters for quantum affine symmetric pairs that do not arise from restriction of ordinary $q$-characters, thereby revealing genuinely new structures in this new setting.

Boundary $q$-characters of evaluation modules for split quantum affine symmetric pairs

TL;DR

This work constructs and analyzes evaluation modules for affine quantum symmetric pair coideal subalgebras of split type , using Lu–Wang’s Drinfeld-type presentation and a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis to compute the spectrum of the Lu–Wang Cartan subalgebra. It proves an evaluation homomorphism via braid-group action and derives explicit boundary -character formulas for evaluation modules, with a tableaux interpretation that mirrors normal -characters but reveals extra symmetry. The authors show that boundary -characters satisfy a Nakajima-like highest-weight property in this setting and identify genuinely new structures not arising from restriction of ordinary -characters. The results bridge GT-pattern combinatorics with boundary eigenvalues, enabling concrete computations of classical and non-classical boundary characters and providing tools for further exploration of boundary phenomena in quantum symmetric pairs.

Abstract

We study evaluation modules for quantum symmetric pair coideal subalgebras of affine type . By computing the action of the generators in Lu and Wang's Drinfeld-type presentation on Gelfand-Tsetlin bases, we determine the spectrum of a large commutative subalgebra arising from the Lu-Wang presentation. This leads to an explicit formula for boundary analogues of -characters in the setting of quantum affine symmetric pairs. We interpret this formula combinatorially in terms of semistandard Young tableaux. Our results imply that boundary -characters share familiar features with ordinary -characters - such as a version of the highest weight property - yet they also display new phenomena, including an extra symmetry. In particular, we provide the first examples of boundary -characters for quantum affine symmetric pairs that do not arise from restriction of ordinary -characters, thereby revealing genuinely new structures in this new setting.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 56 sections, 29 theorems, 184 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 3.2

Theorems & Definitions (61)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • Definition 3.3
  • Definition 3.4
  • Lemma 3.5
  • proof
  • ...and 51 more