The Effect of the Network in Cutting Carbon for Geo-shifted Workloads
Yibo Guo, Amanda Tomlinson, Runlong Su, George Porter
TL;DR
This work tackles the problem of reducing the carbon footprint of cloud workloads by intelligently migrating computation across geographies (space-shifting) while accounting for the often-significant carbon cost of WAN data transfers. It advances the state of the art by improving CIDT estimation through combining traceroute data with inferred physical routes, and by providing a public route dataset and a linear-time optimization algorithm that jointly considers compute and transfer emissions. Through evaluation on representative workloads, time- and region-varying carbon intensities, and load-balancing strategies, the study shows that space-shifting can deliver substantial carbon savings—often outperforming time-shifting alone—especially for low-data workloads, and that careful route- and region-selection is essential to realize these benefits. The findings highlight practical implications for carbon-aware cloud orchestration, suggesting that operators should account for WAN carbon costs, utilize distributed data-center inventories, and consider timezone and seasonal effects to maximize reductions in real-world deployments.
Abstract
Organizations are increasingly offloading their workloads to cloud platforms. For workloads with relaxed deadlines, this presents an opportunity to reduce the total carbon footprint of these computations by moving workloads to datacenters with access to low-carbon power. Recently published results have shown that the carbon footprint of the wide-area network (WAN) can be a significant share of the total carbon output of executing the workload itself, and so careful selection of the time and place where these computations are offloaded is critical. In this paper, we propose an approach to geographic workload migration that uses high-fidelity maps of physical Internet infrastructure to better estimate the carbon costs of WAN transfers. Our findings show that space-shifting workloads can achieve much higher carbon savings than time-shifting alone, if accurate estimates of WAN carbon costs are taken into account.
