Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unraveling Dicke Superradiant Decay with Separable Coherent Spin States

Pedro Rosario, Luiz O. R. Solak, A. Cidrim, R. Bachelard, Johannes Schachenmayer

Abstract

We show that idealized Dicke superradiant decay from a fully inverted state can at all times be described by a positive statistical mixture of coherent spin states (CSS). Since CSS are separable, this implies that no entanglement is involved in Dicke decay. Based on this result, we introduce a new numerical quantum trajectory approach leading to low-entanglement unravelings. This opens up new possibilities for employing matrix product state (MPS) techniques for large-scale numerical simulations with collective decay processes.

Unraveling Dicke Superradiant Decay with Separable Coherent Spin States

Abstract

We show that idealized Dicke superradiant decay from a fully inverted state can at all times be described by a positive statistical mixture of coherent spin states (CSS). Since CSS are separable, this implies that no entanglement is involved in Dicke decay. Based on this result, we introduce a new numerical quantum trajectory approach leading to low-entanglement unravelings. This opens up new possibilities for employing matrix product state (MPS) techniques for large-scale numerical simulations with collective decay processes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 22 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: (a) Superradiant decay represented as a fall through the collective Bloch sphere. This leads to mixed states (grey points) on the $S_z$-axis. Our ansatz consists in representing those states as mixtures of coherent spin states (CSS), Eq. \ref{['eq:CSS_ansatz']}, here sketched for $N=2$ (12 arrows pointing to the surface of the sphere). (b) Evolution of the coefficients $\rho_m$ in the entangled Dicke state expansion \ref{['eq:DS_ansatz']} ($N=5$). (c) Equivalent positive evolution of expansion coefficients $P_a$ in the CSS ansatz \ref{['eq:CSS_ansatz']}, which demonstrates the absence of entanglement.
  • Figure 2: (a) Logarithm of negativity $\log_{10}(\mathcal{N})$ in the range $[-10,0]$ as function of time and $\eta$, for $N=30$. Before the burst time $t_B = \ln (N)/\Gamma$ (dashed lines) many positive solutions exist. Insets: Zooms in the ranges $0 \leq t\Gamma \leq 0.5$, $10^{-3} \leq \eta \leq 0.7$ and $9 \leq t\Gamma \leq 9.02$, $0.97332 \leq \eta \leq 0.97344$. After $t_B$, two passages to late times with positive solutions are highlighted: star (lower, at all time remaining $\eta \leq 1$), triangle (upper). (b) $\log_{10}(\mathcal{N})$ as function of $\eta$ at $t\Gamma=8$. For different $N$, $\mathcal{N} \to 0$ in the areas of the two passages. (c) Evolution with $P_a >0$ for a numerically extracted $\eta(t)$ along the lower passage ($N=30, \mathcal{N} < 10^{-6}$). (d) $\{P_{a}\}_{a=0}^{N}$ distribution as function of $\theta$ at different times ($N=30$). At $t_B$, the peak centers around $\theta=\pi/2$.
  • Figure 3: Trajectory averaged evolution ($N=50$) of (a) normalized Bloch vector length $\overline{\xi}$ and (b) TE. We compare naive [Kraus operators \ref{['eq:kraus_E']}], $\phi$-randomized, and $\phi$-optimized unravelings [using randomized/optimized choices of Kraus operators \ref{['eq:kraus_F']}, see text]. The scaling with $N$ is analyzed for averaged: (c) minimum Bloch vector length, $\xi_\chi$; and (d) maximum TE, $\overline{S}_{\rm max}$. Dashed lines highlight the burst time.
  • Figure S1: (a) Numerically extracted positive-$\bm{P}$ solutions close to the lower passage for different values of $N$. All solutions remain close to the analytical result for $N=2$ (red line). The smooth behavior may suggest the existence of a a general smooth solution for $N>2$. (b) $P_a$ evolution for $N=20$ and (c) $N=40$ ($\mathcal{N} < 10^{-6}$). The vertical dashed lines indicate the burst time.
  • Figure S2: QT simulations for $N=50$ with randomized $\phi_F$ taking the average over 100 trajectories: (a) TE evolution using various choices of $\theta_F$. No major variation in TE is observed when comparing $\theta_F=\pi/8, \pi/4, 3\pi/4$; (b) TE evolution for different timesteps, showing invariance with respect to $\Delta t$