Embodied-R: Collaborative Framework for Activating Embodied Spatial Reasoning in Foundation Models via Reinforcement Learning
Baining Zhao, Ziyou Wang, Jianjie Fang, Chen Gao, Fanhang Man, Jinqiang Cui, Xin Wang, Xinlei Chen, Yong Li, Wenwu Zhu
TL;DR
Embodied-R tackles embodied spatial reasoning by decoupling perception and reasoning: using a large vision-language model to process continuous video frames and a small language model trained with reinforcement learning to perform slow-thinking and reasoning. A novel key-frame extractor reduces computation, while a three-part reward system including a logical-consistency reward aligns thinking with answers. The approach achieves state-of-the-art-like performance on in-distribution and out-of-distribution embodied tasks with modest data (5k videos) and a 3B LM, and shows emergent slow-thinking behaviors and robust generalization. These findings highlight the value of perception-reasoning collaboration and reward design for building embodied reasoning in resource-efficient settings.
Abstract
Humans can perceive and reason about spatial relationships from sequential visual observations, such as egocentric video streams. However, how pretrained models acquire such abilities, especially high-level reasoning, remains unclear. This paper introduces Embodied-R, a collaborative framework combining large-scale Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for perception and small-scale Language Models (LMs) for reasoning. Using Reinforcement Learning (RL) with a novel reward system considering think-answer logical consistency, the model achieves slow-thinking capabilities with limited computational resources. After training on only 5k embodied video samples, Embodied-R with a 3B LM matches state-of-the-art multimodal reasoning models (OpenAI-o1, Gemini-2.5-pro) on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution embodied spatial reasoning tasks. Embodied-R also exhibits emergent thinking patterns such as systematic analysis and contextual integration. We further explore research questions including response length, training on VLM, strategies for reward design, and differences in model generalization after SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning) and RL training.
