Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Symplectic Non-hyperbolicity

Spencer Cattalani

TL;DR

This paper develops a symplectic framework for complex lines using Ahlfors currents, extending Bangert's existence results and connecting holomorphic disk dynamics to non-hyperbolicity in the symplectic category. It builds a toolbox—filling functions, relative fillings, large-scale monotonicity, and a continuity method—to guarantee the existence of Ahlfors currents and to analyze their qualitative behavior. A bubbling theorem via averaging shows that families of $J$-holomorphic curves yield Ahlfors currents as weak limits, with corollaries including GW-type invariants under suitable compactness. It also proves that the space of Ahlfors currents is convex and weakly compact, enabling a geometric understanding of their extreme points and suggesting new symplectic invariants derived from their convex geometry. Altogether the results quantify transcendental noncompactness phenomena in symplectic geometry and provide a robust framework for studying symplectic non-hyperbolicity through Ahlfors currents.

Abstract

Complex (affine) lines are a major object of study in complex geometry, but their symplectic aspects are not well understood. We perform a systematic study based on their associated Ahlfors currents. In particular, we generalize (by a different method) a result of Bangert on the existence of complex lines. We show that Ahlfors currents control the asymptotic behavior of families of pseudoholomorphic curves, refining a result of Demailly. Lastly, we show that the space of Ahlfors currents is convex.

Symplectic Non-hyperbolicity

TL;DR

This paper develops a symplectic framework for complex lines using Ahlfors currents, extending Bangert's existence results and connecting holomorphic disk dynamics to non-hyperbolicity in the symplectic category. It builds a toolbox—filling functions, relative fillings, large-scale monotonicity, and a continuity method—to guarantee the existence of Ahlfors currents and to analyze their qualitative behavior. A bubbling theorem via averaging shows that families of -holomorphic curves yield Ahlfors currents as weak limits, with corollaries including GW-type invariants under suitable compactness. It also proves that the space of Ahlfors currents is convex and weakly compact, enabling a geometric understanding of their extreme points and suggesting new symplectic invariants derived from their convex geometry. Altogether the results quantify transcendental noncompactness phenomena in symplectic geometry and provide a robust framework for studying symplectic non-hyperbolicity through Ahlfors currents.

Abstract

Complex (affine) lines are a major object of study in complex geometry, but their symplectic aspects are not well understood. We perform a systematic study based on their associated Ahlfors currents. In particular, we generalize (by a different method) a result of Bangert on the existence of complex lines. We show that Ahlfors currents control the asymptotic behavior of families of pseudoholomorphic curves, refining a result of Demailly. Lastly, we show that the space of Ahlfors currents is convex.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 28 theorems, 51 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

There exists a nonconstant $J$-holomorphic map $u: \mathbb C \longrightarrow T^{2n}$ for any almost complex structure $J$ tamed by the standard symplectic structure on $T^{2n}$.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: The geodesic cone over a curve centered at a point, as in Example \ref{['nonpositive_filling_function_eg']}, is depicted on the left. The geodesic cylinder over a curve based on a totally geodesic submanifold, as in Example \ref{['totally_geodesic_eg']}
  • Figure 2: The chain $C$ filling $\gamma_1 + \gamma_2$ in the proof of Lemma \ref{['superadditivity_lmm']}
  • Figure 3: The shaded region is the chain $C$ constructed in the proof of Lemma \ref{['relative_from_filling_lmm']}.
  • Figure 4: The shaded area is the disk constructed in Lemma \ref{['spectacles_lmm']}. In this figure, $m_i = 2$ and $n_i = 3$.

Theorems & Definitions (69)

  • Theorem 1.1: Ban98
  • Definition 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Remark 1.5
  • Corollary 1.6
  • Corollary 1.7
  • Corollary 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • Corollary 1.10
  • ...and 59 more