Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Complete Intersection Discrepancy of a Curve I: Numerical Invariants

Andrei Benguş-Lasnier, Antoni Rangachev

TL;DR

The paper introduces complete intersection discrepancy $I(X,W)$ as a local correction term that enables linking invariants of a Cohen–Macaulay curve $X$ to a surrounding complete intersection $Z$ via an adjunction-type identity $\omega_X = i^*(\mathcal{I}_W \omega_Z)$ derived from Grothendieck duality. It then generalizes key classical formulas, notably the Lè-Teissier multiplicity relations and the genus–degree formula, by expressing local and global invariants through $I(X,W)$ and related ramification data, yielding the fundamental equality $e( Jac(Z,x)) - I_x(X,W) = 2\delta_x + e(R_X)$. For Gorenstein curves, $I(X,W)$ ties to the Nash blowup center, and in the smooth case the arithmetic genus satisfies $p_a(X) = 1 + \frac{\deg(X)(d_1+\cdots+d_{n-1}-n-1) - I(X,W)}{2}$. The work also provides constructive methods to build a suitable CI $Z$, computes $I(X,W)$ in broad cases (including smooth, locally complete intersection, and smoothable $X$), and develops transversality and computability results to support practical calculations and deformations of curves. These advances offer a robust framework for understanding equisingularity, linking, and genus corrections across families of curves.

Abstract

We generalize two classical formulas for complete intersection curves using the complete intersection discrepancy of a curve as a correction term. The first formula is a well-known multiplicity formula in singularity theory due to Lê, Greuel and Teissier that relates some of the basic invariants of a curve singularity. We apply its generalization elsewhere to the study of equisingularity of curves. The second formula is the genus--degree formula for projective curves. The main technical tool used to obtain these generalizations is an adjunction-type identity derived from Grothendieck duality theory.

The Complete Intersection Discrepancy of a Curve I: Numerical Invariants

TL;DR

The paper introduces complete intersection discrepancy as a local correction term that enables linking invariants of a Cohen–Macaulay curve to a surrounding complete intersection via an adjunction-type identity derived from Grothendieck duality. It then generalizes key classical formulas, notably the Lè-Teissier multiplicity relations and the genus–degree formula, by expressing local and global invariants through and related ramification data, yielding the fundamental equality . For Gorenstein curves, ties to the Nash blowup center, and in the smooth case the arithmetic genus satisfies . The work also provides constructive methods to build a suitable CI , computes in broad cases (including smooth, locally complete intersection, and smoothable ), and develops transversality and computability results to support practical calculations and deformations of curves. These advances offer a robust framework for understanding equisingularity, linking, and genus corrections across families of curves.

Abstract

We generalize two classical formulas for complete intersection curves using the complete intersection discrepancy of a curve as a correction term. The first formula is a well-known multiplicity formula in singularity theory due to Lê, Greuel and Teissier that relates some of the basic invariants of a curve singularity. We apply its generalization elsewhere to the study of equisingularity of curves. The second formula is the genus--degree formula for projective curves. The main technical tool used to obtain these generalizations is an adjunction-type identity derived from Grothendieck duality theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 21 theorems, 125 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

We have When $Z$ is general, we have $e(\mathrm{Jac}(X,x))=e(\mathrm{Jac}(Z,x))$ and $I_x(X,W)=\mathrm{cid}(X,x)$. In addition, if $x$ is a tame point (e.g. $\mathrm{char}(\mathbbm{k})=0)$, then $e(R_X)=m_x-r_x$ and thus

Theorems & Definitions (48)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Corollary 2.4
  • Definition 3.1
  • ...and 38 more