Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Encoding argumentation frameworks with set attackers to propositional logic systems

Shuai Tang, Jiachao Wu, Ning Zhou

TL;DR

This paper tackles the lack of a unified encoding for advanced argumentation frameworks by introducing AFSA, a general framework that supports higher-order attacks and sets of attackers. It builds HLAF, BHAF, SETAF, and the unified HSAF into AFSA, provides complete semantics and three numerical equational semantics, and develops encodings into $PL_3^L$ and $PL_{[0,1]}$ to establish model-equivalence results. A formal equational approach and Brouwer fixed-point arguments guarantee solution existence for the numerical semantics, and semantic transformations show how to translate between AFSA families while preserving semantics. The work lays a solid logical foundation for automated reasoning tools in AI, decision support, and multi-agent systems, enabling robust handling of complex attack structures in uncertain or graded settings.

Abstract

Argumentation frameworks ($AF$s) have been a useful tool for approximate reasoning. The encoding method is an important approach to formally model $AF$s under related semantics. The aim of this paper is to develop the encoding method from classical Dung's $AF$s ($DAF$s) to $AF$s with set attackers ($AFSA$s) including higher-level argumentation frames ($HLAF$s), Barringer's higher-order $AF$s ($BHAF$s), frameworks with sets of attacking arguments ($SETAF$s) and higher-order set $AF$s ($HSAF$s). Regarding syntactic structures, we propose the $HSAF$s where the target of an attack is either an argument or an attack and the sources are sets of arguments and attacks. Regarding semantics, we translate $HLAF$s and $SETAF$s under respective complete semantics to Łukasiewicz's 3-valued propositional logic system ($PL_3^L$). Furthermore, we propose complete semantics of $BHAF$s and $HSAF$s by respectively generalizing from $HLAF$s and $SETAF$s, and then translate to the $PL_3^L$. Moreover, for numerical semantics of $AFSA$s, we propose the equational semantics and translate to fuzzy propositional logic systems ($PL_{[0,1]}$s). This paper establishes relationships of model equivalence between an $AFSA$ under a given semantics and the encoded formula in a related propositional logic system ($PLS$). By connections of $AFSA$s and $PLS$s, this paper provides the logical foundations for $AFSA$s associated with complete semantics and equational semantics. The results advance the argumentation theory by unifying $HOAF$s and $SETAF$s under logical formalisms, paving the way for automated reasoning tools in AI, decision support, and multi-agent systems.

Encoding argumentation frameworks with set attackers to propositional logic systems

TL;DR

This paper tackles the lack of a unified encoding for advanced argumentation frameworks by introducing AFSA, a general framework that supports higher-order attacks and sets of attackers. It builds HLAF, BHAF, SETAF, and the unified HSAF into AFSA, provides complete semantics and three numerical equational semantics, and develops encodings into and to establish model-equivalence results. A formal equational approach and Brouwer fixed-point arguments guarantee solution existence for the numerical semantics, and semantic transformations show how to translate between AFSA families while preserving semantics. The work lays a solid logical foundation for automated reasoning tools in AI, decision support, and multi-agent systems, enabling robust handling of complex attack structures in uncertain or graded settings.

Abstract

Argumentation frameworks (s) have been a useful tool for approximate reasoning. The encoding method is an important approach to formally model s under related semantics. The aim of this paper is to develop the encoding method from classical Dung's s (s) to s with set attackers (s) including higher-level argumentation frames (s), Barringer's higher-order s (s), frameworks with sets of attacking arguments (s) and higher-order set s (s). Regarding syntactic structures, we propose the s where the target of an attack is either an argument or an attack and the sources are sets of arguments and attacks. Regarding semantics, we translate s and s under respective complete semantics to Łukasiewicz's 3-valued propositional logic system (). Furthermore, we propose complete semantics of s and s by respectively generalizing from s and s, and then translate to the . Moreover, for numerical semantics of s, we propose the equational semantics and translate to fuzzy propositional logic systems (s). This paper establishes relationships of model equivalence between an under a given semantics and the encoded formula in a related propositional logic system (). By connections of s and s, this paper provides the logical foundations for s associated with complete semantics and equational semantics. The results advance the argumentation theory by unifying s and s under logical formalisms, paving the way for automated reasoning tools in AI, decision support, and multi-agent systems.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 41 sections, 69 theorems, 154 equations, 1 figure, 2 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For an $HLAF=(\mathsf{A}^{HL(0)}, \mathsf{R}^{HL(n)})$ and an assignment $\|\cdot\|: \mathsf{A}^{HL(0)}\cup\mathsf{R}^{HL(n)}\to \{0,1,\frac{1}{2}\}$,

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Hierarchy for $AFSA$s.

Theorems & Definitions (149)

  • Definition 1: dung1995acceptability
  • Definition 2: gabbay2009semantics
  • Definition 3: flouris2019comprehensive
  • Definition 4
  • Definition 5: gabbay2009semantics
  • Definition 6: flouris2019comprehensive
  • Definition 7
  • Definition 8
  • Definition 9: klir1995fuzzy
  • Definition 10: Hajek1998
  • ...and 139 more