Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Degree sum conditions and a 2-factor with a bounded number of cycles in claw-free graphs

Masaki Kashima

TL;DR

This work advances the understanding of 2-factors with a bounded number of cycles in claw-free graphs by leveraging Ryjáček's closure to reduce the problem to line graphs of triangle-free graphs. The authors prove that for a claw-free graph $G$ of order $n$, if every independent set $I$ satisfies $|I|\le\delta_G(I)-1$ and $\sigma_{k+1}(G)\ge n$, then $G$ contains a $2$-factor with at most $k$ cycles; a notable corollary is that $\delta(G)\ge\alpha(G)+1$ guarantees a $2$-factor with at most $\alpha(G)$ cycles, partially resolving a conjecture of Faudree et al. (2012). The key method combines the closure technique with a line-graph–to–triangle-free graph reduction and dominating-system arguments to control cycle structure. These results enrich the structural theory of claw-free graphs and connect degree-sum conditions with cycle decompositions, offering insight into how local independent-set constraints influence global spanning subgraphs.

Abstract

A claw-free graph is a graph that does not contain $K_{1,3}$ as an induced subgraph, and a 2-factor is a 2-regular spanning subgraph of a graph. In 1997, Ryjáček introduced the closure concept of claw-free graphs, and Hamilton cycles and related structures in claw-free graphs have been intensively studied via the closure concept. In this paper, using the closure concept, we show that for a claw-free graph $G$ of order $n$, if every independent set $I$ of $G$ satisfies $|I|\leq δ_G(I)-1$ and $G$ satisfies $σ_{k+1}(G)\geq n$, then $G$ has a 2-factor with at most $k$ cycles, where $δ_G(I)$ denotes the minimum degree of the vertices in $I$. As a corollary of the result, we show that every claw-free graph $G$ with $δ(G)\geq α(G)+1$ has a 2-factor with at most $α(G)$ cycles, which partially solves a conjecture by Faudree et al. in 2012.

Degree sum conditions and a 2-factor with a bounded number of cycles in claw-free graphs

TL;DR

This work advances the understanding of 2-factors with a bounded number of cycles in claw-free graphs by leveraging Ryjáček's closure to reduce the problem to line graphs of triangle-free graphs. The authors prove that for a claw-free graph of order , if every independent set satisfies and , then contains a -factor with at most cycles; a notable corollary is that guarantees a -factor with at most cycles, partially resolving a conjecture of Faudree et al. (2012). The key method combines the closure technique with a line-graph–to–triangle-free graph reduction and dominating-system arguments to control cycle structure. These results enrich the structural theory of claw-free graphs and connect degree-sum conditions with cycle decompositions, offering insight into how local independent-set constraints influence global spanning subgraphs.

Abstract

A claw-free graph is a graph that does not contain as an induced subgraph, and a 2-factor is a 2-regular spanning subgraph of a graph. In 1997, Ryjáček introduced the closure concept of claw-free graphs, and Hamilton cycles and related structures in claw-free graphs have been intensively studied via the closure concept. In this paper, using the closure concept, we show that for a claw-free graph of order , if every independent set of satisfies and satisfies , then has a 2-factor with at most cycles, where denotes the minimum degree of the vertices in . As a corollary of the result, we show that every claw-free graph with has a 2-factor with at most cycles, which partially solves a conjecture by Faudree et al. in 2012.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 13 theorems, 6 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $k\geq 3$ be an integer and let $G$ be a claw-free graph of order $n\geq 3(k+1)^2-3$. If $\delta(G)\geq 3k-1$ and $\sigma_{k+1}(G)>n+k^2-2k+4$, then $G$ has a 2-factor with at most $k$ cycles.

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Theorem 1: FRS2004
  • Theorem 2: FMOY2012
  • Conjecture 3: FMOY2012
  • Theorem 4: KOY2012
  • Theorem 5: Karxiv
  • Conjecture 6: Karxiv
  • Theorem 7
  • Corollary 8
  • Corollary 9
  • Theorem 10: R1997
  • ...and 11 more