Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Periodic homogenization of convolution type operators with heavy tails

Andrey Piatnitski, Elena Zhizhina

TL;DR

The paper investigates periodic homogenization for nonlocal convolution operators with heavy-tailed kernels in the domain of attraction of a symmetric $\alpha$-stable law, modulated by a periodic coefficient. Using compactness arguments rather than correctors, it proves strong resolvent convergence of $(-L^{\varepsilon}+m)^{-1}$ in $L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ to the resolvent of an effective nonlocal operator $L^{\rm eff}$ whose kernel is $\Lambda^{\rm eff}(x,y)=\overline{\Lambda} \; k(\frac{x-y}{|x-y|})$ and is given by $L^{\rm eff}u(x)=\mathrm{p.v.}\int\frac{\overline{\Lambda} k(\frac{x-y}{|x-y|})(u(y)-u(x))}{|x-y|^{d+\alpha}}\,dy$. The limit operator is unbounded with domain in $H^{\alpha/2}(\mathbb{R}^d)$, contrasting with the bounded prelimit operators on $L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$. The results extend to kernels comparable to $L(|z|)/|z|^{d+\alpha}$ with slowly varying $L$, and align with prior work on stable-like homogenization while handling integrable, heavy-tailed kernels. The approach yields strong resolvent convergence in $L^2$, and explicit form of the effective operator via the mean of $\Lambda$ and the angular density $k$, providing a rigorous description of the homogenized limit for a broad class of nonlocal jump processes. The findings have implications for modeling anomalous diffusion in periodic media where jumps follow stable-like laws. (All mathematical expressions are stated with explicit $\;$LaTeX-style notation.)

Abstract

The paper deals with periodic homogenization of nonlocal symmetric convolution type operators in $L^2(\mathbb R^d)$, whose kernel is the product of a density that belongs to the domain of attraction of an $α$-stable law and a rapidly oscillating positive periodic function. Assuming that the local oscillation of the said density satisfies a proper upper bound at infinity, we prove homogenization result for the studied family of operators.

Periodic homogenization of convolution type operators with heavy tails

TL;DR

The paper investigates periodic homogenization for nonlocal convolution operators with heavy-tailed kernels in the domain of attraction of a symmetric -stable law, modulated by a periodic coefficient. Using compactness arguments rather than correctors, it proves strong resolvent convergence of in to the resolvent of an effective nonlocal operator whose kernel is and is given by . The limit operator is unbounded with domain in , contrasting with the bounded prelimit operators on . The results extend to kernels comparable to with slowly varying , and align with prior work on stable-like homogenization while handling integrable, heavy-tailed kernels. The approach yields strong resolvent convergence in , and explicit form of the effective operator via the mean of and the angular density , providing a rigorous description of the homogenized limit for a broad class of nonlocal jump processes. The findings have implications for modeling anomalous diffusion in periodic media where jumps follow stable-like laws. (All mathematical expressions are stated with explicit LaTeX-style notation.)

Abstract

The paper deals with periodic homogenization of nonlocal symmetric convolution type operators in , whose kernel is the product of a density that belongs to the domain of attraction of an -stable law and a rapidly oscillating positive periodic function. Assuming that the local oscillation of the said density satisfies a proper upper bound at infinity, we prove homogenization result for the studied family of operators.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 4 theorems, 87 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.1

Let conditions bas_prop_p - M-3 be fulfilled, and assume that Lambda holds true. Then for each $f \in L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ the solution $u^{\varepsilon}$ of Ue converges strongly in $L^2(\mathbb{R}^d)$ to the solution $u$ of U-limit - L0limit.

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Theorem 2.1
  • Remark 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.2
  • proof
  • Remark 3.1
  • Lemma 3.3
  • proof