Dual Engines of Thoughts: A Depth-Breadth Integration Framework for Open-Ended Analysis
Fei-Hsuan Yu, Yun-Cheng Chou, Teng-Ruei Chen
TL;DR
DEoT presents a depth-breadth integration framework for open-ended analysis, pairing a Breadth Engine with a Depth Engine under an Engine Controller to balance broad coverage and deep investigation. The architecture is built around a Base Prompter, a Solver Agent, and a versatile toolbox that includes news search, event extraction, and historical analysis, enabling coordinated multi-agent reasoning with tool support. The authors introduce the News-to-Question (N2Q) dataset and a multi-criteria evaluation scheme using GPT-4o as the judge, reporting strong analytical depth and innovation relative to GPT-4o and Perplexity AI across five domains. While DEoT excels at open-ended, multi-faceted reasoning, it shows room for improvement in practicality and the generation of domain-specific, actionable arguments, guiding future work on knowledge integration and adaptive reasoning. Overall, DEoT demonstrates a robust framework for scalable, multi-dimensional analysis with potential applications in finance, policy, technology forecasting, and beyond.
Abstract
We propose the Dual Engines of Thoughts (DEoT), an analytical framework for comprehensive open-ended reasoning. While traditional reasoning frameworks primarily focus on finding "the best answer" or "the correct answer" for single-answer problems, DEoT is specifically designed for "open-ended questions," enabling both broader and deeper analytical exploration. The framework centers on three key components: a Base Prompter for refining user queries, a Solver Agent that orchestrates task decomposition, execution, and validation, and a Dual-Engine System consisting of a Breadth Engine (to explore diverse impact factors) and a Depth Engine (to perform deep investigations). This integrated design allows DEoT to balance wide-ranging coverage with in-depth analysis, and it is highly customizable, enabling users to adjust analytical parameters and tool configurations based on specific requirements. Experimental results show that DEoT excels in addressing complex, multi-faceted questions, achieving a total win rate of 77-86% compared to existing reasoning models, thus highlighting its effectiveness in real-world applications.
