Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On generalized Lambert function

Alexander Kreinin, Andrey Marchenko, Vladimir Vinogradov

TL;DR

This work generalizes the Lambert W framework by introducing a generalized Lambert function defined implicitly by $y^\beta = 1 - e^{-xy}$ with $x>0$ and $\beta>1$, and explores its rich connections to extinction probabilities in Galton-Watson processes. It establishes the inverse representation $y_\beta(x)$ of $x_\beta(y) = -\log(1-y^\beta)/y$, proves monotonicity and a continued-exponential representation, and derives two-sided asymptotic bounds and contraction properties near the fixed point. The paper develops a probabilistic interpretation by showing $y_\beta(x)$ is the cdf of an absolutely continuous r.v. $\xi_\beta$, and provides closed-form moment expressions, a uniform random-variable representation, and connections to Tornheim sums and zeta-values. It also offers practical numerical methods, including efficient asymptotic approximations and iteration counts, and analyzes the moment problem for $\xi_\beta$ to establish determinacy. Collectively, the results give a comprehensive analytic and numerical treatment of a generalized Lambert function with applications to branching processes and stochastic modeling.

Abstract

We consider a particular generalized Lambert function, $y(x)$, defined by the implicit equation $y^β= 1 - e^{-xy}$, with $x>0$ and $ β> 1$. Solutions to this equation can be found in terms of a certain continued exponential. Asymptotic and structural properties of a non-trivial solution, $y_β(x)$, and its connection to the extinction probability of related branching processes are discussed. We demonstrate that this function constitutes a cumulative distribution function of a previously unknown non-negative absolutely continuous random variable.

On generalized Lambert function

TL;DR

This work generalizes the Lambert W framework by introducing a generalized Lambert function defined implicitly by with and , and explores its rich connections to extinction probabilities in Galton-Watson processes. It establishes the inverse representation of , proves monotonicity and a continued-exponential representation, and derives two-sided asymptotic bounds and contraction properties near the fixed point. The paper develops a probabilistic interpretation by showing is the cdf of an absolutely continuous r.v. , and provides closed-form moment expressions, a uniform random-variable representation, and connections to Tornheim sums and zeta-values. It also offers practical numerical methods, including efficient asymptotic approximations and iteration counts, and analyzes the moment problem for to establish determinacy. Collectively, the results give a comprehensive analytic and numerical treatment of a generalized Lambert function with applications to branching processes and stochastic modeling.

Abstract

We consider a particular generalized Lambert function, , defined by the implicit equation , with and . Solutions to this equation can be found in terms of a certain continued exponential. Asymptotic and structural properties of a non-trivial solution, , and its connection to the extinction probability of related branching processes are discussed. We demonstrate that this function constitutes a cumulative distribution function of a previously unknown non-negative absolutely continuous random variable.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 22 theorems, 131 equations, 12 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 2.1

Let $\lambda>0$ and $\beta>1$. Then Equation (eq:e_pr_ds) has the unique solution in the open interval $(0, 1)$.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: The function ${\mathcal{F}}(x)$.
  • Figure 2: Graph of the generalized Lambert function.
  • Figure 3: Iterations of the mapping $\widehat{{\mathcal{W}}}$.
  • Figure 4: Surface of the function $y_\beta(x)$.
  • Figure 5: Graph of the function $z(t)$.
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (51)

  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Definition 3.1
  • Remark 3.2
  • Remark 3.3
  • Remark 3.4
  • Lemma 3.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.6
  • proof
  • ...and 41 more