Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Exact Current Fluctuations in a Tight-Binding Chain with Dephasing Noise

Taiki Ishiyama, Kazuya Fujimoto, Tomohiro Sasamoto

TL;DR

This work analyzes current fluctuations in a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise under a step density profile. By unveiling a nontrivial omega-dependence of the current's moment generating function and computing exact Green's functions via a Bethe-ansatz treatment of the equivalent Fermi-Hubbard problem on the infinite lattice, the authors derive an exact expression for the variance and its long-time asymptotics. They show that any nonzero dephasing drives the current fluctuations from ballistic to diffusive, with a universal asymptotic form that matches the symmetric exclusion process (SEP) results, and they verify this behavior numerically using GKSL unraveling and determinant formulas. The work also establishes a precise correspondence with SEP for the cumulant generating function, highlighting a deep link between quantum open-system fluctuations and classical stochastic processes. Overall, the paper provides a rigorous quantum-transport analogue of classical fluctuation results and opens pathways to exact higher-order fluctuation analyses in open quantum integrable systems.

Abstract

For a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise on an infinite interval, we exactly calculate the variance of the integrated current for a step initial condition with average densities, $ρ_a$ on the negative axis and $ρ_b$ on the positive axis. Our exact solution reveals that the presence of dephasing, no matter how small, alters the nature of current fluctuations from ballistic to diffusive in the long-time limit. The derivation relies on the Bethe ansatz on the infinite interval and a nontrivial parameter dependence, referred to as the $ω$-dependence, of the moment generating function for the integrated current. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the asymptotic form of the variance and a numerically obtained cumulant generating function coincide with those in the symmetric simple exclusion process.

Exact Current Fluctuations in a Tight-Binding Chain with Dephasing Noise

TL;DR

This work analyzes current fluctuations in a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise under a step density profile. By unveiling a nontrivial omega-dependence of the current's moment generating function and computing exact Green's functions via a Bethe-ansatz treatment of the equivalent Fermi-Hubbard problem on the infinite lattice, the authors derive an exact expression for the variance and its long-time asymptotics. They show that any nonzero dephasing drives the current fluctuations from ballistic to diffusive, with a universal asymptotic form that matches the symmetric exclusion process (SEP) results, and they verify this behavior numerically using GKSL unraveling and determinant formulas. The work also establishes a precise correspondence with SEP for the cumulant generating function, highlighting a deep link between quantum open-system fluctuations and classical stochastic processes. Overall, the paper provides a rigorous quantum-transport analogue of classical fluctuation results and opens pathways to exact higher-order fluctuation analyses in open quantum integrable systems.

Abstract

For a tight-binding chain with dephasing noise on an infinite interval, we exactly calculate the variance of the integrated current for a step initial condition with average densities, on the negative axis and on the positive axis. Our exact solution reveals that the presence of dephasing, no matter how small, alters the nature of current fluctuations from ballistic to diffusive in the long-time limit. The derivation relies on the Bethe ansatz on the infinite interval and a nontrivial parameter dependence, referred to as the -dependence, of the moment generating function for the integrated current. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the asymptotic form of the variance and a numerically obtained cumulant generating function coincide with those in the symmetric simple exclusion process.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 4 theorems, 100 equations, 6 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

For $n=1$ and $n=2$, $\psi^{(2n)}_t(\bm{x};\bm{a}| \bm{y})$ can be expressed as with $\oint dz^{2n}:= \prod_{j=1}^{2n}\oint_{|z_j|=r^{2n-j}} dz_j/2\pi i z_j$. Here, $\phi$ and $E$ are given in and below Eq. SM:vector_bethe, and in $\phi$, we specify $\vert \bm{z} \rangle$ as In the contour integrals, we set $r$ to be sufficiently small: $r\ll 1$, so that all poles of $1/(s_j-s_{k}-2\gamma)$ with

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the step initial condition for $\rho_a=1$ and $\rho_b=0$. Starting from the step initial condition, we evolve the system according to Eq. \ref{['eq:GKSL']} and investigate the fluctuations of an integrated current $Q_t$ across the bond between site $0$ and site $1$.
  • Figure 2: Numerical verification for the asymptotic form in Eq. \ref{['eq:asymptotic_variance_2']}. The dots represent the numerical results for $\gamma=1$ and system size $2L=128$. The dashed line shows Eq. \ref{['eq:asymptotic_variance_2']}.
  • Figure 3: Comparison of the cumulant generating function $\chi(\lambda,t)$ for $\rho_a=1$ and $\rho_b=0$. The dots represent the numerical results for our model with $\tau=400$ and system size $2L=256$. The dashed line shows the analytical result in SEP, Eq. \ref{['eq:SEP']}. The inset shows the results with $\tau=20$ and system size $2L=256$.
  • Figure S-1: Schematic illustration of the initial condition $\psi^{(2n)}_t(\bm{x};\bm{a}|\bm{y})$.
  • Figure S-2: Schematic illustrations of the branch cut of $\alpha(z)$ for (a) $1<\gamma$ and (b) $\gamma \leq 1$. The wavy lines represent the branch cut, where $\beta$ and $\beta'$ are the roots of the quadratic equations, $x^2+2(2\gamma+1)x+1=0$ and $x^2+2(2\gamma-1)x+1=0$, respectively. The dashed lines represent unit circles for clarity.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Theorem
  • Remark
  • Lemma 1
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:reduction']}
  • Lemma 2
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:I']}
  • Lemma 3
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lem:scattering']}