Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Corrector-aided Look-ahead Distance-based Guidance for Online Reference Path Following with an Efficient Mid-course Guidance Strategy

Reva Dhillon, Agni Ravi Deepa, Hrishav Das, Subham Basak, Satadal Ghosh

TL;DR

This work tackles autonomous 2-D path following for unmanned vehicles by addressing limitations of fixed look-ahead guidance. It introduces a two-phase strategy: a mid-course phase that optimally steers the UxV toward an initiation circle tangent to the path start using a dynamically selected $L_1$, and a terminal, close-range phase that augments a constant $L_1$ with a corrector point to tighten tracking, while online optimization of $k_1$ and $k_2$ minimizes local RMS cross-track error. The method combines analytic geometric decisions (initiation circle contact, optimal look-ahead) with a weighted sum of look-ahead and corrector-based commands, yielding bounded lateral acceleration and reduced cross-track error compared to conventional constant-$L_1$ guidance. Simulation results on a sinusoidal reference path demonstrate improved tracking performance across diverse initial conditions, validating the proposed algorithm and its online tuning scheme. The approach provides a practical, model-light path-following framework with potential extension to 3-D trajectories.

Abstract

Efficient path-following is crucial in most of the applications of autonomous vehicles (UxV). Among various guidance strategies presented in literature, the look-ahead distance ($L_1$)-based nonlinear guidance has received significant attention due to its ease in implementation and ability to maintain a low cross-track error while following simpler reference paths and generating bounded lateral acceleration commands. However, the constant value of $L_1$ becomes problematic when the UxV is far away from the reference path and also produces higher cross-track error while following complex reference paths having high variation in radius of curvature. To address these challenges, the notion of look-ahead distance is leveraged in a novel way to develop a two-phase guidance strategy. Initially, when the UxV is far from the reference path, an optimized $L_1$ selection strategy is developed to guide the UxV towards the vicinity of the start point of the reference path, while maintaining minimal lateral acceleration command. Once the vehicle reaches a close neighborhood of the reference path, a novel notion of corrector point is incorporated in the constant $L_1$-based guidance scheme to generate the guidance command that effectively reduces the root mean square of the cross-track error and lateral acceleration requirement thereafter. Simulation results validate satisfactory performance of this proposed corrector point and look-ahead point pair-based guidance strategy, along with the developed mid-course guidance scheme. Also, its superiority over the conventional constant $L_1$ guidance scheme is established by simulation studies over different initial condition scenarios.

A Corrector-aided Look-ahead Distance-based Guidance for Online Reference Path Following with an Efficient Mid-course Guidance Strategy

TL;DR

This work tackles autonomous 2-D path following for unmanned vehicles by addressing limitations of fixed look-ahead guidance. It introduces a two-phase strategy: a mid-course phase that optimally steers the UxV toward an initiation circle tangent to the path start using a dynamically selected , and a terminal, close-range phase that augments a constant with a corrector point to tighten tracking, while online optimization of and minimizes local RMS cross-track error. The method combines analytic geometric decisions (initiation circle contact, optimal look-ahead) with a weighted sum of look-ahead and corrector-based commands, yielding bounded lateral acceleration and reduced cross-track error compared to conventional constant- guidance. Simulation results on a sinusoidal reference path demonstrate improved tracking performance across diverse initial conditions, validating the proposed algorithm and its online tuning scheme. The approach provides a practical, model-light path-following framework with potential extension to 3-D trajectories.

Abstract

Efficient path-following is crucial in most of the applications of autonomous vehicles (UxV). Among various guidance strategies presented in literature, the look-ahead distance ()-based nonlinear guidance has received significant attention due to its ease in implementation and ability to maintain a low cross-track error while following simpler reference paths and generating bounded lateral acceleration commands. However, the constant value of becomes problematic when the UxV is far away from the reference path and also produces higher cross-track error while following complex reference paths having high variation in radius of curvature. To address these challenges, the notion of look-ahead distance is leveraged in a novel way to develop a two-phase guidance strategy. Initially, when the UxV is far from the reference path, an optimized selection strategy is developed to guide the UxV towards the vicinity of the start point of the reference path, while maintaining minimal lateral acceleration command. Once the vehicle reaches a close neighborhood of the reference path, a novel notion of corrector point is incorporated in the constant -based guidance scheme to generate the guidance command that effectively reduces the root mean square of the cross-track error and lateral acceleration requirement thereafter. Simulation results validate satisfactory performance of this proposed corrector point and look-ahead point pair-based guidance strategy, along with the developed mid-course guidance scheme. Also, its superiority over the conventional constant guidance scheme is established by simulation studies over different initial condition scenarios.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 14 equations, 12 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Initial engagement geometry
  • Figure 2: Engagement Geometry for constant Look-Ahead Guidance ($\eta<0$ illustrated)
  • Figure 3: Moving to Initiation Circle
  • Figure 4: Initial Heading to Contact Point Mapping
  • Figure 5: Circle Selection in Midcourse Phase
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (1)

  • proof