Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An analogue of the Herbrand-Ribet theorem in graph theory

Daniel Vallières, Chase A. Wilson

TL;DR

This work constructs a graph-theoretic analogue of the Herbrand–Ribet theorem by studying Galois covers $Y/X$ with $\Delta\simeq \mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times}$ and connecting the $p$-primary Picard components to the $p$-adic special values of the equivariant Ihara $L$-function at $u=1$ via $h_{Y/X}(1,\psi)=\psi(\eta_{Y/X}(1))$. The authors prove that $\mathrm{Fit}_{\mathbb{Z}_{p}}(e_{\psi}A)=(h_{Y/X}(1,\psi))$ and deduce the size relation $\# e_{\psi}A=|h_{Y/X}(1,\psi)|_{p}^{-1}$ for nontrivial $\psi$, while reducing modulo $p$ yields $e_{\psi}C\neq 0$ iff $h_{Y/X}(1,\psi)=0$ in $\mathbb{F}_{p}$; these are complemented by a trivial-character identification and a Mazur–Wiles–style refinement via Fitting ideals. The approach blends explicit determinant descriptions of the equivariant Ihara zeta function with algebraic machinery (idempotents, Fitting ideals) to mirror Iwasawa-theoretic arguments in graph theory, and is illustrated by concrete voltage-graph examples validating the main statements. Overall, the work deepens the bridge between arithmetic phenomena and graph zeta theory, suggesting broader Iwasawa-like structure in combinatorial settings.

Abstract

We study an analogue of the Herbrand-Ribet theorem, and its refinement by Mazur and Wiles, in graph theory. For an odd prime number $p$, we let $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ and $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$ denote the finite field with $p$ elements and the ring of $p$-adic integers, respectively. We consider Galois covers $Y/X$ of finite graphs with Galois group $Δ$ isomorphic to $\mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times}$. Given a $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$-valued character of $Δ$, we relate the cardinality of the corresponding character component of the $p$-primary subgroup of the degree zero Picard group of $Y$ to the $p$-adic absolute value of the special value at $u=1$ of the corresponding Artin-Ihara $L$-function.

An analogue of the Herbrand-Ribet theorem in graph theory

TL;DR

This work constructs a graph-theoretic analogue of the Herbrand–Ribet theorem by studying Galois covers with and connecting the -primary Picard components to the -adic special values of the equivariant Ihara -function at via . The authors prove that and deduce the size relation for nontrivial , while reducing modulo yields iff in ; these are complemented by a trivial-character identification and a Mazur–Wiles–style refinement via Fitting ideals. The approach blends explicit determinant descriptions of the equivariant Ihara zeta function with algebraic machinery (idempotents, Fitting ideals) to mirror Iwasawa-theoretic arguments in graph theory, and is illustrated by concrete voltage-graph examples validating the main statements. Overall, the work deepens the bridge between arithmetic phenomena and graph zeta theory, suggesting broader Iwasawa-like structure in combinatorial settings.

Abstract

We study an analogue of the Herbrand-Ribet theorem, and its refinement by Mazur and Wiles, in graph theory. For an odd prime number , we let and denote the finite field with elements and the ring of -adic integers, respectively. We consider Galois covers of finite graphs with Galois group isomorphic to . Given a -valued character of , we relate the cardinality of the corresponding character component of the -primary subgroup of the degree zero Picard group of to the -adic absolute value of the special value at of the corresponding Artin-Ihara -function.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 18 theorems, 92 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

An odd prime $p$ is regular if and only if it does not divide the numerator of any of the Bernoulli numbers $B_{p-i}$ for $i$ an odd integer satisfying $3 \le i \le p-2$.

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Theorem 1.1: Kummer's criterion
  • Theorem 1.2: Herbrand
  • Theorem 1.3: Herbrand-Ribet, first version
  • Theorem 1.4: Herbrand-Ribet, second version
  • Theorem 1.5: Mazur-Wiles
  • Theorem A: \ref{['main11']}
  • Theorem B: \ref{['main']} and \ref{['main22']}
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Proposition 2.3
  • ...and 20 more