Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Primordial Stochastic Gravitational Waves from Massive Higher-Spin Bosons

Haipeng An, Zhehan Qin, Zhong-Zhi Xianyu, Borui Zhang

Abstract

Can a stationary stone radiate gravitational waves (GWs)? While the answer is typically "no" in flat spacetime, we get a "yes" in inflationary spacetime. In this work, we study the stationary-stone-produced GWs in inflation with a concrete model, where the role of stones is played by massive higher-spin particles. We study particles of spin-2 and higher produced by helical chemical potentials, and show that the induced GWs feature a scale-invariant and helicity-biased power spectrum in the slow-roll limit. Including slow-roll corrections leads to interesting backreactions from the higher-spin boson production, resulting in an intriguing scale-dependence of GWs at small scales. Given the existing observational and theoretical constraints, we identify viable parameter regions capable of generating visibly large GWs for future observations.

Primordial Stochastic Gravitational Waves from Massive Higher-Spin Bosons

Abstract

Can a stationary stone radiate gravitational waves (GWs)? While the answer is typically "no" in flat spacetime, we get a "yes" in inflationary spacetime. In this work, we study the stationary-stone-produced GWs in inflation with a concrete model, where the role of stones is played by massive higher-spin particles. We study particles of spin-2 and higher produced by helical chemical potentials, and show that the induced GWs feature a scale-invariant and helicity-biased power spectrum in the slow-roll limit. Including slow-roll corrections leads to interesting backreactions from the higher-spin boson production, resulting in an intriguing scale-dependence of GWs at small scales. Given the existing observational and theoretical constraints, we identify viable parameter regions capable of generating visibly large GWs for future observations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 29 sections, 215 equations, 6 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Evolution of the chemical potential $\kappa_s$, the conformal weight $\mu_s$, the Hubble parameter $H$, and the difference $\kappa_s - \mu_s$, considering the backreaction of fields with different spins on the spacetime background. The figure illustrates results for spin values $s=1,2,3,4,10$, with the Hubble parameter at CMB scales given by $H_{\text{CMB}}\simeq 1.1\times10^{-5}M_{\rm pl}$, and the chemical potential and conformal weight evaluated as $\kappa_{\text{CMB}}=3$ and $\mu_{\text{CMB}}=2$, respectively. The shape factor of the potential is set to $\gamma=0.5$. The background field value at the end of inflation is $\phi_{\text{end}}=1.07~M_{\rm pl}$. The initial background field values at CMB scales depend on spin: $\phi^{s=1}_{N=60}\approx 6.17~M_{\rm pl}$, $\phi^{s=2}_{N=60}\approx 6.17~M_{\rm pl}$, $\phi^{s=3}_{N=60}\approx 6.20~M_{\rm pl}$, $\phi^{s=4}_{N=60}\approx 6.25~M_{\rm pl}$, and $\phi^{s=10}_{N=60}\approx 6.60~M_{\rm pl}$.
  • Figure 2: Parameter space satisfying experimental and theoretical constraints in the $\kappa_s - \mu_s$ vs. $\mu_s$ plane. The spin parameter takes values $s = 1, 2, 10, 40$.
  • Figure 3: The gravitational wave spectra generated by fields with different spin values. We consider spin values $s = 1,2,3,4,10$ with a fixed parameter $\gamma = 0.5$. The values of $\kappa_s$ and $\mu_s$ correspond to the six benchmark points listed in Tab. \ref{['tab:benchmarks']}. In the left column and the second plot of the right column, we fix $\kappa_s - \mu_s = 1$ while varying $\mu_s$ as $1, 2, 5, 7$. In the plots of the right column, we keep $\mu_s = 5$ fixed and progressively increase the difference $\kappa_s - \mu_s$ to $0.5, 1,$ and $1.5$. Additionally, we overlay the constraints from ongoing and proposed gravitational wave experiments.
  • Figure 4: The gravitational wave spectra generated by the massive spin-$2$ field with $\gamma=0.5$. $\kappa$ and $\mu$ are set to be the 6 benchmark points in Tab. (\ref{['tab:benchmarks']}). We also present the constraints of ongoing and proposed gravitational wave experiments.
  • Figure 5: The difference between chemical potential $\kappa$ and conformal weight $\mu$ of massive spin-$2$ field with potential parameter $\gamma=0.5$. $\kappa$ and $\mu$ are set to be the 6 benchmark points in Tab. (\ref{['tab:benchmarks']}).
  • ...and 1 more figures