Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the Hausdorff dimension of maximal chains and antichains of Turing and Hyperarithmetic degrees

Sirun Song, Liang Yu

TL;DR

This work analyzes fractal dimensions of degree structures in computability theory, focusing on maximal chains and maximal antichains in the Turing and hyperarithmetic lattices. It develops a toolkit including $\Pi^1_1$ randomness, $\Delta^1_1$-domination, recursive traceability, and Sacks forcing to quantify Hausdorff and packing dimensions of these degree configurations. The authors prove that all maximal antichains in hyperdegrees have Hausdorff dimension $1$, construct a maximal $\omega_1$-chain in the Turing degrees with effective Hausdorff dimension $0$ (and a $\Pi^1_1$-definable version under $\omega_1=(\omega_1)^L$), and analyze maximal antichains in Turing degrees—showing effective Hausdorff dimension $1$ (relativized to K-trivial oracles) and packing dimension $1$ as well. They also discuss relativization limits and pose open questions regarding the minimal possible dimension under various oracles.

Abstract

This paper investigates the Hausdorff dimension properties of chains and antichains in Turing degrees and hyperarithmetic degrees. Our main contributions are threefold: First, for antichains in hyperarithmetic degrees, we prove that every maximal antichain necessarily attains Hausdorff dimension 1. Second, regarding chains in Turing degrees, we establish the existence of a maximal chain with Hausdorff dimension 0. Furthermore, under the assumption that $ω_1=(ω_1)^L$, we demonstrate the existence of such maximal chains with $Π^1_1$ complexity. Third, we extend our investigation to maximal antichains of Turing degrees by analyzing both the packing dimension and effective Hausdorff dimension.

On the Hausdorff dimension of maximal chains and antichains of Turing and Hyperarithmetic degrees

TL;DR

This work analyzes fractal dimensions of degree structures in computability theory, focusing on maximal chains and maximal antichains in the Turing and hyperarithmetic lattices. It develops a toolkit including randomness, -domination, recursive traceability, and Sacks forcing to quantify Hausdorff and packing dimensions of these degree configurations. The authors prove that all maximal antichains in hyperdegrees have Hausdorff dimension , construct a maximal -chain in the Turing degrees with effective Hausdorff dimension (and a -definable version under ), and analyze maximal antichains in Turing degrees—showing effective Hausdorff dimension (relativized to K-trivial oracles) and packing dimension as well. They also discuss relativization limits and pose open questions regarding the minimal possible dimension under various oracles.

Abstract

This paper investigates the Hausdorff dimension properties of chains and antichains in Turing degrees and hyperarithmetic degrees. Our main contributions are threefold: First, for antichains in hyperarithmetic degrees, we prove that every maximal antichain necessarily attains Hausdorff dimension 1. Second, regarding chains in Turing degrees, we establish the existence of a maximal chain with Hausdorff dimension 0. Furthermore, under the assumption that , we demonstrate the existence of such maximal chains with complexity. Third, we extend our investigation to maximal antichains of Turing degrees by analyzing both the packing dimension and effective Hausdorff dimension.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 30 theorems, 57 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.2

For every locally countable partial order $\mathbb P =(2^\omega,\leq_P)$, there is a non-measurable antichain in $\mathbb P$. In particularly, there is a non-measurable antichain in $(2^\omega,\leq_T)$.

Theorems & Definitions (47)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: Liang Yu yu2006measure
  • Theorem 2.3: C.T.Chong and L.Yu chong2016measure
  • Proposition 2.4: See chong2015recursion
  • Theorem 2.5: Kjos-Hanssen,Nies,Stephan and Yu kjos2010higher
  • Theorem 2.6: C.T.Chong and L.Yu chong2015randomness
  • Theorem 2.7: The hyperimmune-free basis theorem,Jockusch and Soare jockusch1972pi01
  • Theorem 2.8: Jockusch jockusch1969relationships, Martin
  • Theorem 2.9: Terwijn and Zambella terwijn1997algorithmic
  • Theorem 2.10: J.H.Lutz lutz2000galeslutz2003dimensions
  • ...and 37 more