Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Constructibility real degrees in the side-by-side Sacks model

Lorenzo Notaro

TL;DR

This work analyzes the join-semilattice of constructibility real degrees $(\mathcal{D}_c, \le_c)$ in the side-by-side Sacks model $\mathrm{L}[G]$, establishing a powerful representation theorem that identifies $(\mathcal{D}_c, \le_c)$ with a concrete system $(\mathcal{R}, \subseteq)$ built from the generic Sacks reals. The authors prove that the semilattice is rigid, not complemented, and not sigma-complete, and that, except for trivial least/greatest elements, no degree is definable without parameters. They further show that the set of Sacks degrees is amorphous and that no embedding of $(\mathcal{P}(\omega), \subseteq)$ into $(\mathcal{D}_c, \le_c)$ can be an ideal, revealing fundamental limits on representing the power set within this framework. The results hinge on a detailed fusion-based analysis and a key representation map $\Omega$, enabling transfer of combinatorial properties to the constructibility-degrees structure. Overall, the paper clarifies the rigid and highly non-absolute nature of real degrees in the infinite-sided Sacks setting and delineates sharp boundaries for definability and embeddability within this context.

Abstract

We study the join-semilattice of constructibility real degrees in the side-by-side Sacks model, the model of set theory obtained by forcing with a countable-support product of infinitely many Sacks forcings over the constructible universe. In particular, we prove that in the side-by-side Sacks model the join-semilattice of constructibility real degrees is rigid, i.e. it does not have non-trivial automorphisms.

Constructibility real degrees in the side-by-side Sacks model

TL;DR

This work analyzes the join-semilattice of constructibility real degrees in the side-by-side Sacks model , establishing a powerful representation theorem that identifies with a concrete system built from the generic Sacks reals. The authors prove that the semilattice is rigid, not complemented, and not sigma-complete, and that, except for trivial least/greatest elements, no degree is definable without parameters. They further show that the set of Sacks degrees is amorphous and that no embedding of into can be an ideal, revealing fundamental limits on representing the power set within this framework. The results hinge on a detailed fusion-based analysis and a key representation map , enabling transfer of combinatorial properties to the constructibility-degrees structure. Overall, the paper clarifies the rigid and highly non-absolute nature of real degrees in the infinite-sided Sacks setting and delineates sharp boundaries for definability and embeddability within this context.

Abstract

We study the join-semilattice of constructibility real degrees in the side-by-side Sacks model, the model of set theory obtained by forcing with a countable-support product of infinitely many Sacks forcings over the constructible universe. In particular, we prove that in the side-by-side Sacks model the join-semilattice of constructibility real degrees is rigid, i.e. it does not have non-trivial automorphisms.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 15 theorems, 44 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

In $\mathrm{L}[G]$, $(\mathcal{D}_c, \le_c)$ is neither a meet-semilattice, nor $\sigma$-complete, nor complemented.

Theorems & Definitions (47)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Lemma 6
  • proof
  • Proposition 7
  • proof
  • Corollary 8
  • ...and 37 more