On the Nature of Fractal Numbers and the Classical Continuum Hypothesis (CH)
Stanislav Semenov
TL;DR
This work reframes the real continuum through a stratified hierarchy of definability, replacing the classical fixed totality with a fractal continuum built from admissible chains of formal systems. Real numbers are seen as process defined objects that emerge at specific definability levels, yielding a continuum whose cardinality equals c but whose internal structure is a lattice of definability layers rather than a single jump from aleph_0 to c. It develops the fractal continuum R^{F_omega}, proves constructive bijections to Cantor space, and shows that the Continuum Hypothesis loses its force in this setting. By introducing definability compression and a constructive projection of the fractal core onto the classical interval, the paper provides a bridge between constructive analysis, reverse mathematics, and foundational questions about numberhood and computation, with potential links to topos theory and the formal study of definability depth. The framework offers a new lens on the emergence of numbers, suggesting practical implications for proof verification, constructive analysis, and the philosophical understanding of the continuum.
Abstract
We propose a reinterpretation of the continuum grounded in the stratified structure of definability rather than classical cardinality. In this framework, a real number is not an abstract point on the number line, but an object expressible at some level Fn of a formal hierarchy. We introduce the notion of "fractal numbers" -- entities defined not within a fixed set-theoretic universe, but through layered expressibility across constructive systems. This reconceptualizes irrationality as a relative property, depending on definability depth, and replaces the binary dichotomy between countable and uncountable sets with a gradated spectrum of definability classes. We show that the classical Continuum Hypothesis loses its force in this context: between aleph_0 and c lies not a single cardinal jump, but a stratified sequence of definitional stages, each forming a countable yet irreducible approximation to the continuum. We argue that the real line should not be seen as a completed totality but as an evolving architecture of formal expressibility. We conclude with a discussion of rational invariants, the relativity of irrationality, and the emergence of a fractal metric for definitional density.
