Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hybrid d/p-wave altermagnetism in Ca$_{3}$Ru$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and strain-controlled spin splitting

Andrea León, Carmine Autieri, Thomas Brumme, Jhon W. González

Abstract

The interplay of strong electronic correlations, sizable octahedral distortions, and pronounced spin-orbit coupling (SOC) makes perovskite oxides promising candidates for realizing altermagnetic phases. We study altermagnetic phases in Ca$_3$Ru$_2$O$_7$, a non-centrosymmetric layered perovskite whose ground state is a Kramers-degenerate antiferromagnet. We show that an alternative Néel-type spin arrangement hosts a P-2 d-wave altermagnetic state with orbital selectivity similar to Ca$_2$RuO$_4$. Including SOC generates a symmetry-allowed p-wave component and yields a hybrid d/p-wave altermagnetic order. We further demonstrate that biaxial strain tunes both magnetic stability and band splitting: compressive strain beyond 2 % favors the altermagnetic phase over the antiferromagnetic ground state, while tensile strain increases altermagnetic splittings by up to 9 %. To quantify these trends, we define an altermagnetic figure of merit and trace its strain dependence to changes in electronic localization and octahedral geometry in this polar metal.

Hybrid d/p-wave altermagnetism in Ca$_{3}$Ru$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and strain-controlled spin splitting

Abstract

The interplay of strong electronic correlations, sizable octahedral distortions, and pronounced spin-orbit coupling (SOC) makes perovskite oxides promising candidates for realizing altermagnetic phases. We study altermagnetic phases in CaRuO, a non-centrosymmetric layered perovskite whose ground state is a Kramers-degenerate antiferromagnet. We show that an alternative Néel-type spin arrangement hosts a P-2 d-wave altermagnetic state with orbital selectivity similar to CaRuO. Including SOC generates a symmetry-allowed p-wave component and yields a hybrid d/p-wave altermagnetic order. We further demonstrate that biaxial strain tunes both magnetic stability and band splitting: compressive strain beyond 2 % favors the altermagnetic phase over the antiferromagnetic ground state, while tensile strain increases altermagnetic splittings by up to 9 %. To quantify these trends, we define an altermagnetic figure of merit and trace its strain dependence to changes in electronic localization and octahedral geometry in this polar metal.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 11 equations, 16 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Ca$_{3}$Ru$_{2}$O$_{7}$ in its magnetic ground-state configuration exhibits spins aligned ferromagnetically (FM) within the plane and antiferromagnetically (AFM) between layers. This schematic illustrates that, under time-reversal operation, the spins cannot be connected by rotational symmetry alone because they can be connected through translational symmetry operations along the c-axis. These Kramers antiferromagnets are also named SST-3Yuan2023 in the literature. Consequently, Ca$_{3}$Ru$_{2}$O$_{7}$ exhibits Kramers antiferromagnetism in its ground state.
  • Figure 2: Explored magnetic configurations in Ca$_3$Ru$_2$O$_7$ with zero net magnetization in the non-relativistic limit. These are the only inequivalent magnetic phases. Red and blue spheres represent atoms with majority spin-up and spin-down orientation, respectively. Ca and O atoms are omitted for clarity.
  • Figure 3: Upper and lower panels show the total and Ru-4$d$ projected density of states (DOS), respectively, for magnetic configurations A and B.
  • Figure 4: (a)--(b) Electronic band structure for configurations A and B, respectively. The blue region highlights the altermagnetic bands. The AM region along the R--$\Gamma$--R$^{\prime}$ and T--$\Gamma$--T$^{\prime}$ directions. In contrast, the AFM region is defined along the $yz$ direction, represented by the U--$\Gamma$--U$^{\prime}$ path. The Brillouin zone is given in Fig. \ref{['fig5']}.
  • Figure 5: Brillouin zone of the orthorhombic structure. High-symmetry points related by symmetry are labeled as $\mathrm{R}/\mathrm{R}' = (\pm 0.5, 0.5, 0.5)$, $\mathrm{T}/\mathrm{T}' = (0,\pm 0.5, 0.5)$, $\mathrm{U}/\mathrm{U}' = (\pm 0.5, 0,0.5)$, $\mathrm{Y}/\mathrm{Y}' = (0, \pm 0.5, 0)$, and $\mathrm{X}/\mathrm{X}' = (\pm 0.5, 0, 0)$, in units of the reciprocal lattice vectors.
  • ...and 11 more figures