Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous

Samuele Marro, Davide Evangelista, X. Angelo Huang, Emanuele La Malfa, Michele Lombardi, Michael Wooldridge

TL;DR

This work formally extends Transformers to capture the nuances of time and space continuity in both input and output space, and challenge the traditional interpretation of how LLMs understand language.

Abstract

Language is typically modelled with discrete sequences. However, the most successful approaches to language modelling, namely neural networks, are continuous and smooth function approximators. In this work, we show that Transformer-based language models implicitly learn to represent sentences as continuous-time functions defined over a continuous input space. This phenomenon occurs in most state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), including Llama2, Llama3, Phi3, Gemma, Gemma2, and Mistral, and suggests that LLMs reason about language in ways that fundamentally differ from humans. Our work formally extends Transformers to capture the nuances of time and space continuity in both input and output space. Our results challenge the traditional interpretation of how LLMs understand language, with several linguistic and engineering implications.

Language Models Are Implicitly Continuous

TL;DR

This work formally extends Transformers to capture the nuances of time and space continuity in both input and output space, and challenge the traditional interpretation of how LLMs understand language.

Abstract

Language is typically modelled with discrete sequences. However, the most successful approaches to language modelling, namely neural networks, are continuous and smooth function approximators. In this work, we show that Transformer-based language models implicitly learn to represent sentences as continuous-time functions defined over a continuous input space. This phenomenon occurs in most state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), including Llama2, Llama3, Phi3, Gemma, Gemma2, and Mistral, and suggests that LLMs reason about language in ways that fundamentally differ from humans. Our work formally extends Transformers to capture the nuances of time and space continuity in both input and output space. Our results challenge the traditional interpretation of how LLMs understand language, with several linguistic and engineering implications.