Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Non-Birkhoff periodic orbits in symmetric billiards

Casper Oelen, Bob Rink, Mattia Sensi

TL;DR

This work identifies a quantitative criterion based on the boundary length $L$ and curvature $\kappa$ along a $\mathbb{D}_n$-symmetric Birkhoff orbit that guarantees the existence of non-Birkhoff periodic orbits with prescribed minimal period, rotation number, and spatiotemporal symmetry. The authors develop a monotone discrete variational framework, employ a gradient-flow approach to the length functional, and leverage Aubry–Mather-type ideas to locate stationary points under symmetry constraints, including detailed Hessian analysis. They prove the existence of infinitely many non-Birkhoff orbits near circular and elliptical billiards, and in particular provide criteria that yield new non-Birkhoff orbits in $\mathbb{D}_n$-symmetric billiards as well as in $\mathbb{D}_2$-symmetric cases, with several explicit constructions and a numerical toolkit. The results significantly extend understanding of non-Birkhoff dynamics in symmetric convex billiards and suggest broad applicability to other monotone variational problems with discrete symmetry.

Abstract

We study non-Birkhoff periodic orbits in symmetric convex planar billiards. Our main result provides a quantitative criterion for the existence of such orbits with prescribed minimal period, rotation number, and spatiotemporal symmetry. We exploit this criterion to find sufficient conditions for a symmetric billiard to possess infinitely many non-Birkhoff periodic orbits. It follows that arbitrarily small analytical perturbations of the circular billiard have non-Birkhoff periodic orbits of any rational rotation number and with arbitrarily long periods. We also generalize a known result for elliptical billiards to other $\mathbb{D}_2$-symmetric billiards. Lastly, we provide Matlab codes which can be used to numerically compute and visualize the non-Birkhoff periodic orbits whose existence we prove analytically.

Non-Birkhoff periodic orbits in symmetric billiards

TL;DR

This work identifies a quantitative criterion based on the boundary length and curvature along a -symmetric Birkhoff orbit that guarantees the existence of non-Birkhoff periodic orbits with prescribed minimal period, rotation number, and spatiotemporal symmetry. The authors develop a monotone discrete variational framework, employ a gradient-flow approach to the length functional, and leverage Aubry–Mather-type ideas to locate stationary points under symmetry constraints, including detailed Hessian analysis. They prove the existence of infinitely many non-Birkhoff orbits near circular and elliptical billiards, and in particular provide criteria that yield new non-Birkhoff orbits in -symmetric billiards as well as in -symmetric cases, with several explicit constructions and a numerical toolkit. The results significantly extend understanding of non-Birkhoff dynamics in symmetric convex billiards and suggest broad applicability to other monotone variational problems with discrete symmetry.

Abstract

We study non-Birkhoff periodic orbits in symmetric convex planar billiards. Our main result provides a quantitative criterion for the existence of such orbits with prescribed minimal period, rotation number, and spatiotemporal symmetry. We exploit this criterion to find sufficient conditions for a symmetric billiard to possess infinitely many non-Birkhoff periodic orbits. It follows that arbitrarily small analytical perturbations of the circular billiard have non-Birkhoff periodic orbits of any rational rotation number and with arbitrarily long periods. We also generalize a known result for elliptical billiards to other -symmetric billiards. Lastly, we provide Matlab codes which can be used to numerically compute and visualize the non-Birkhoff periodic orbits whose existence we prove analytically.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 32 theorems, 116 equations, 16 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $m,n\in \mathbb{N}$ be co-prime, with $1\leq m \leq n-1$, and let $\Gamma$ be a $\mathbb{D}_n$-symmetric, $C^2$-smooth, strictly convex simple closed curve. Let $Z\in \Gamma^{\mathbb{Z}}$ be one of its two $\mathbb{D}_n$-symmetric Birkhoff periodic orbits with rotation number $\frac{m}{n}$. Deno then $\Gamma$ admits a non-Birkhoff periodic orbit with minimal period $p$, rotation number $\frac{

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Visualization of Theorem \ref{['thm:sample']} in four distinct symmetric convex billiards. (a)$\mathbb{D}_1$-symmetric $(6,3)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit in a $\mathbb{D}_2$-symmetric billiard -- note that the billiard trajectory is traversed in two directions throughout each period; (b)$\mathbb{D}_3$-symmetric $(15,5)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit in a $\mathbb{D}_3$-symmetric billiard; (c)$\mathbb{D}_4$-symmetric $(12,3)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit in a $\mathbb{D}_4$-symmetric billiard; (d)$\mathbb{D}_5$-symmetric $(245,98)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit in a close-to-circular $\mathbb{D}_5$-symmetric billiard.
  • Figure 2: $\mathbb{D}_3$-symmetric billiard $\Gamma$ and part of a billiard sequence $z=(\ldots, z_i, z_{i+1}, \ldots)\in \Gamma^{\mathbb{Z}}$. The angle of incidence at $z_i$ is denoted $\phi_i$, and the angle of reflection at $z_i$ is denoted $\theta_i$. We have that $z$ is a billiard orbit precisely when $\phi_i=\theta_i$ for all $i\in \mathbb{Z}$.
  • Figure 3: Symmetric billiards with Birkhoff periodic orbits and non-Birkhoff periodic orbits: (a)$\mathbb{D}_4$-symmetric billiard with two $(4,1)$-periodic Birkhoff orbits, the "short" one in red and the "long" one in cyan; (b)$\mathbb{D}_4$-symmetric billiard with $(12,3)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit: note that $z_9\prec z_1 \prec z_2$ holds but $z_{10} \prec z_{2} \prec z_{3}$ does not; (c)$\mathbb{D}_5$-symmetric billiard with two $(5,2)$-periodic Birkhoff orbits, the "short" one in red and the "long" one in cyan; (d)$\mathbb{D}_5$-symmetric billiard with $(15,6)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit: note that $z_6\prec z_{1} \prec z_2$ holds but $z_7 \prec z_{2} \prec z_{3}$ does not.
  • Figure 4: Aubry diagrams of a Birkhoff sequence (solid line) and five of its integer translates (dashed); recall Remark \ref{['rem:Bir_no_touch']}.
  • Figure 5: Symmetric billiard orbits have symmetric Aubry diagrams by Lemma \ref{['liftlemma']}. (a) Convex $\mathbb{D}_2$-symmetric billiard of Limaçon-type (see Example \ref{['ex:limacon']}) with parameter $\alpha=0.1995<\alpha^*(2)= 0.2$. possessing a $(2,1)$-periodic Birkhoff orbit (red) and a $(6,3)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit (blue), both satisfying $S(z_i)=z_{3+i}$ and $R(z_i)=z_{7-i}$; (b) Aubry diagrams of lifts of these orbits satisfying $x_i+x_{3+i}=i$ and $x_{7-i}-x_i=\frac{1}{2}-i$; (c) Convex $\mathbb{D}_3$-symmetric billiard of Limaçon-type (see Example \ref{['ex:limacon']}) with parameter $\alpha=0.09<\alpha^*(3)= 0.1$, possessing a $(3,1)$-periodic Birkhoff orbit (red) and a $(6,2)$-periodic non-Birkhoff orbit (blue), both satisfying $S(z_i)=z_{7-i}$; (d) Aubry diagrams of lifts of these orbits satisfying $x_i+x_{7-i}=0$.
  • ...and 11 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (86)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Remark 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 3.1
  • Definition 3.2
  • ...and 76 more