Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimation

Angelos Pelecanos, Xinyu Tan, Ewin Tang, John Wright

TL;DR

This work shows that learning the spectrum of a $d$-dimensional quantum state can be done with unentangled measurements using strictly fewer copies than full state tomography, addressing a long-standing question about the difficulty of spectrum estimation. The authors introduce a spectrum-learning algorithm built on three pillars: bucketing the spectrum into large and small eigenvalues, estimating moments of the small bucket via unbiased U-statistics derived from a uniform POVM, and applying local moment matching with a linear-programming rounding step to reconstruct the sorted spectrum. The main result provides an explicit copy complexity of $n = O\big(d^3\cdot (\frac{\log\log d}{\log d})^4 \cdot \varepsilon^{-6}\big)$ for constant error $\varepsilon$ and unentangled measurements, together with multiplicative-error moment-estimation bounds and additive-error Rényi-entropy estimates. The paper also offers compelling classical analogies, rigorous variance bounds for quantum moment estimators, and computational evidence suggesting subpolynomial improvements over tomography even in the entangled setting, highlighting both the potential and limitations of current approaches for spectrum learning.

Abstract

How many copies of a mixed state $ρ\in \mathbb{C}^{d \times d}$ are needed to learn its spectrum? To date, the best known algorithms for spectrum estimation require as many copies as full state tomography, suggesting the possibility that learning a state's spectrum might be as difficult as learning the entire state. We show that this is not the case in the setting of unentangled measurements, by giving a spectrum estimation algorithm that uses $n = O(d^3\cdot (\log\log(d) / \log(d))^4 )$ copies of $ρ$, which is asymptotically fewer than the $n = Ω(d^3)$ copies necessary for full state tomography. Our algorithm is inspired by the technique of local moment matching from classical statistics, and shows how it can be applied in the quantum setting. As an important subroutine in our spectrum estimation algorithm, we give an estimator of the $k$-th moment $\operatorname{tr}(ρ^k)$ which performs unentangled measurements and uses $O(d^{3-2/k})$ copies of $ρ$ in order to achieve a constant multiplicative error. This directly translates to an additive-error estimator of quantum Renyi entropy of order $k$ with the same number of copies. Finally, we present numerical evidence that the sample complexity of spectrum estimation can only improve over full state tomography by a sub-polynomial factor. Specifically, for spectrum learning with fully entangled measurements, we run simulations which suggest a lower bound of $Ω(d^{2 - γ})$ copies for any constant $γ> 0$. From this, we conclude the current best lower bound of $Ω(d)$ is likely not tight.

Beating full state tomography for unentangled spectrum estimation

TL;DR

This work shows that learning the spectrum of a -dimensional quantum state can be done with unentangled measurements using strictly fewer copies than full state tomography, addressing a long-standing question about the difficulty of spectrum estimation. The authors introduce a spectrum-learning algorithm built on three pillars: bucketing the spectrum into large and small eigenvalues, estimating moments of the small bucket via unbiased U-statistics derived from a uniform POVM, and applying local moment matching with a linear-programming rounding step to reconstruct the sorted spectrum. The main result provides an explicit copy complexity of for constant error and unentangled measurements, together with multiplicative-error moment-estimation bounds and additive-error Rényi-entropy estimates. The paper also offers compelling classical analogies, rigorous variance bounds for quantum moment estimators, and computational evidence suggesting subpolynomial improvements over tomography even in the entangled setting, highlighting both the potential and limitations of current approaches for spectrum learning.

Abstract

How many copies of a mixed state are needed to learn its spectrum? To date, the best known algorithms for spectrum estimation require as many copies as full state tomography, suggesting the possibility that learning a state's spectrum might be as difficult as learning the entire state. We show that this is not the case in the setting of unentangled measurements, by giving a spectrum estimation algorithm that uses copies of , which is asymptotically fewer than the copies necessary for full state tomography. Our algorithm is inspired by the technique of local moment matching from classical statistics, and shows how it can be applied in the quantum setting. As an important subroutine in our spectrum estimation algorithm, we give an estimator of the -th moment which performs unentangled measurements and uses copies of in order to achieve a constant multiplicative error. This directly translates to an additive-error estimator of quantum Renyi entropy of order with the same number of copies. Finally, we present numerical evidence that the sample complexity of spectrum estimation can only improve over full state tomography by a sub-polynomial factor. Specifically, for spectrum learning with fully entangled measurements, we run simulations which suggest a lower bound of copies for any constant . From this, we conclude the current best lower bound of is likely not tight.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 49 sections, 30 theorems, 204 equations, 3 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

There is an algorithm which solves spectrum estimation in copies using unentangled measurements.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Testing uniformity: This plot displays, for a dimension $d$, the smallest number of samples $n$ necessary to correctly distinguish between $\alpha^{(2,d)}$ and $\beta^{(2,d)}$ with success probability $0.7$. Success probabilities are estimated by taking the empirical probability from $10^5$ trials. $d$ is taken be a multiple of $2$ ranging from $6$ to $48$. The corresponding $n$ values of the data points are $9, 12, 15, 18, 20, 24, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 50, 53, 56, 59, 62, 64, 68, 71$.
  • Figure 2: Testing distributions with matching second moments: This plot displays, for a dimension $d$, the smallest number of samples $n$ necessary to correctly distinguish between $\alpha^{(3,d)}$ and $\beta^{(3,d)}$ with success probability $0.7$. Success probabilities are estimated by taking the empirical probability from $10^5$ trials. $d$ is taken to be a multiple of $3$ ranging from $6$ to $48$. The corresponding $n$ values of the data points are $21, 37, 56, 76, 97, 120, 145, 171, 196, 223, 253, 281, 312, 342, 376$.
  • Figure 3: Testing distributions with matching third moments: This plot displays, for a dimension $d$, the smallest number of samples $n$ necessary to correctly distinguish between $\alpha^{(4,d)}$ and $\beta^{(4,d)}$ with success probability $0.7$. Success probabilities are estimated by taking the empirical probability from $10^5$ trials. $d$ is taken to be a multiple of $4$ ranging from $4$ to $40$. The corresponding $n$ values of the data points are $19, 51, 95, 147, 209, 274, 347, 426, 511, 598$.

Theorems & Definitions (69)

  • Theorem 1.1: Main result
  • Theorem 1.2: Quantum Rényi entropy estimation
  • Example 2.1: Uniformity testing
  • Definition 4.1: Total variation distance
  • Definition 4.2: Schatten $k$-norm
  • Definition 4.3: Trace distance
  • Definition 4.4: Fidelity
  • Lemma 4.5: Fuchs-van de Graaf inequalities
  • Definition 4.6: The Haar measure
  • Definition 4.7: Haar random vectors
  • ...and 59 more