Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Matching, Unanticipated Experiences, Divorce, Flirting, Rematching, Etc

Burkhard C. Schipper, Tina Danting Zhang

Abstract

We study dynamic decentralized two-sided matching in which players may encounter unanticipated experiences. As they become aware of these experiences, they may change their preferences over players on the other side of the market. Consequently, they may get ``divorced'' and rematch again with other agents, which may lead to further unanticipated experiences etc. A matching is stable if there is absence of pairwise common belief in blocking. Stable matchings can be destabilized by unanticipated experiences. Yet, we show that there exist self-confirming outcomes that are stable and do not lead to further unanticipated experiences. We introduce a natural decentralized matching process that, at each period assigns probability $1 - \varepsilon$ to the satisfaction of a mutual optimal blocking pair (if it exists) and picks any optimal blocking pair otherwise. The parameter $\varepsilon$ is interpreted as a friction of the matching market. We show that for any decentralized matching process, frictions are necessary for convergence to stability even without unawareness. Our process converges to self-confirming stable outcomes. Further, we allow for bilateral communication/flirting that changes the awareness and say that a matching is flirt-proof stable if there is absence of communication leading to pairwise common belief in blocking. We show that our natural decentralized matching process converges to flirt-proof self-confirming outcomes.

Matching, Unanticipated Experiences, Divorce, Flirting, Rematching, Etc

Abstract

We study dynamic decentralized two-sided matching in which players may encounter unanticipated experiences. As they become aware of these experiences, they may change their preferences over players on the other side of the market. Consequently, they may get ``divorced'' and rematch again with other agents, which may lead to further unanticipated experiences etc. A matching is stable if there is absence of pairwise common belief in blocking. Stable matchings can be destabilized by unanticipated experiences. Yet, we show that there exist self-confirming outcomes that are stable and do not lead to further unanticipated experiences. We introduce a natural decentralized matching process that, at each period assigns probability to the satisfaction of a mutual optimal blocking pair (if it exists) and picks any optimal blocking pair otherwise. The parameter is interpreted as a friction of the matching market. We show that for any decentralized matching process, frictions are necessary for convergence to stability even without unawareness. Our process converges to self-confirming stable outcomes. Further, we allow for bilateral communication/flirting that changes the awareness and say that a matching is flirt-proof stable if there is absence of communication leading to pairwise common belief in blocking. We show that our natural decentralized matching process converges to flirt-proof self-confirming outcomes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 10 theorems, 17 equations, 13 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1

There does not exist a decentralized process of satisfying blocking pairs that always chooses mutually optimal blocking pairs when they exist and always reaches a stable matching.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: Knuth's Cycle
  • Figure 2: Cycle with Unique Mutually Optimal Blocking Pairs Only
  • Figure 3: Illustration of an Unawareness Structure with Two Players and Two Characteristics
  • Figure 4: Unawareness Structure of Example 3
  • Figure 5: Stable matching at $\omega_1$
  • ...and 8 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Definition 1
  • Definition 2: Stability
  • Definition 3
  • Definition 4: Self-confirming outcome
  • Proposition 3
  • Lemma 1
  • Proposition 4
  • Lemma 2
  • ...and 6 more