Preference-Centric Route Recommendation: Equilibrium, Learning, and Provable Efficiency
Ya-Ting Yang, Yunian Pan, Quanyan Zhu
TL;DR
This paper addresses the limitations of Wardrop Equilibrium for capturing diverse, context-dependent user preferences in route recommendation. It introduces a preference-centric framework built on Borda Coarse Correlated Equilibrium (BCCE) and a Dueling-Adaptive Recommendation (DR) algorithm that learns from binary, pairwise feedback to drive the system toward BCCE. The authors prove an expected regret bound of $\mathcal{O}(\max_u (|\mathcal{S}_u|\log|\mathcal{S}_u|)^{1/3} T^{2/3})$ under carefully chosen learning and exploration parameters and illustrate practical efficacy via a case study. The work offers a scalable, parameter-free approach with provable efficiency for preference-guided route recommendation, highlighting its potential to better model bounded rationality and real-time user feedback in navigation platforms.
Abstract
Traditional approaches to modeling and predicting traffic behavior often rely on Wardrop Equilibrium (WE), assuming non-atomic traffic demand and neglecting correlations in individual decisions. However, the growing role of real-time human feedback and adaptive recommendation systems calls for more expressive equilibrium concepts that better capture user preferences and the stochastic nature of routing behavior. In this paper, we introduce a preference-centric route recommendation framework grounded in the concept of Borda Coarse Correlated Equilibrium (BCCE), wherein users have no incentive to deviate from recommended strategies when evaluated by Borda scores-pairwise comparisons encoding user preferences. We develop an adaptive algorithm that learns from dueling feedback and show that it achieves $\mathcal{O}(T^{\frac{2}{3}})$ regret, implying convergence to the BCCE under mild assumptions. We conduct empirical evaluations using a case study to illustrate and justify our theoretical analysis. The results demonstrate the efficacy and practical relevance of our approach.
