Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Conditional Extreme Value Estimation for Dependent Time Series

Martin Bladt, Laurits Glargaard, Theodor Henningsen

TL;DR

This work develops conditional extreme value methods for dependent, heavy-tailed time series with covariates by formulating a functional tail process. It proves consistency under $\alpha$-mixing and asymptotic normality under $\beta$-mixing with broad second-order conditions, using a kernel-based conditional tail estimator and a conditional Hill estimator tied through the identity $\gamma(x)=\int_{1}^{\infty} T^{x}(s)/s\,ds$. The authors provide finite-sample guidance, including bandwidth selection, and validate the approach via simulations under various dependence structures and a real oil-market application, where tail behavior varies with conditioning values like the OVX volatility index. The results yield simple, plug-in variance expressions and offer a practical framework for conditional tail risk assessment, with potential extensions to conditional risk measures and lagged covariate models.

Abstract

We study the consistency and weak convergence of the conditional tail function and conditional Hill estimators under broad dependence assumptions for a heavy-tailed response sequence and a covariate sequence. Consistency is established under $α$-mixing, while asymptotic normality follows from $β$-mixing and second-order conditions. A key aspect of our approach is its versatile functional formulation in terms of the conditional tail process. Simulations demonstrate its performance across dependence scenarios. We apply our method to extreme event modelling in the oil industry, revealing distinct tail behaviours under varying conditioning values.

Conditional Extreme Value Estimation for Dependent Time Series

TL;DR

This work develops conditional extreme value methods for dependent, heavy-tailed time series with covariates by formulating a functional tail process. It proves consistency under -mixing and asymptotic normality under -mixing with broad second-order conditions, using a kernel-based conditional tail estimator and a conditional Hill estimator tied through the identity . The authors provide finite-sample guidance, including bandwidth selection, and validate the approach via simulations under various dependence structures and a real oil-market application, where tail behavior varies with conditioning values like the OVX volatility index. The results yield simple, plug-in variance expressions and offer a practical framework for conditional tail risk assessment, with potential extensions to conditional risk measures and lagged covariate models.

Abstract

We study the consistency and weak convergence of the conditional tail function and conditional Hill estimators under broad dependence assumptions for a heavy-tailed response sequence and a covariate sequence. Consistency is established under -mixing, while asymptotic normality follows from -mixing and second-order conditions. A key aspect of our approach is its versatile functional formulation in terms of the conditional tail process. Simulations demonstrate its performance across dependence scenarios. We apply our method to extreme event modelling in the oil industry, revealing distinct tail behaviours under varying conditioning values.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 29 sections, 39 theorems, 225 equations, 7 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Assume def:condRV and that conditions Assu:gamma_lip-Assu:g_n_consistent hold and that the time series $\left\{\left(X_{j}, Y_{j}\right), j \in \mathbb{Z} \right\}$ is stationary and m-dependent. Then the convergence being uniform on compacts bounded away from zero.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Top panel: covariate process $\left\{X_j\right\}$ given by the Crude Oil Volatility Index (CBOE OVX). The effective sample is calculated using a uniform kernel centred at $x=0.05,\, 0.50,\, 0. 95$ (highlighted in red, green and blue, respectively) and with $h_n=0.05$. Middle panel: target process $\left\{Y_j\right\}$ given by the absolute value of the negative log-returns of the West Texas Intermediate (WTI) grade crude oil spot prices with highlighted subsamples. Bottom panel: conditional Hill estimates $\widehat{\gamma}_{n}\left(x\right)$ in dotted blue, dashdotted green and dashed red, respectively; in solid grey we have the unconditional Hill estimator of the entire sample.
  • Figure 2: Top panels: Bias. Bottom panels: MSE. We consider the conditional Fréchet model (low dependence (far left) and high dependence (center left)) $n = 10^3, 10^{4}$ in solid and dashed, respectively; number of simulations is $N = 500$. We also consider the conditional Pareto model (low dependence (center right) and high dependence (far right)) with $n = 500, N = 200$, and optimal bandwidth of $\left\{X_j, Y_j\right\}$ using least-squares cross validation (long dash), optimal bandwidth of $X$ (dot dash), optimal bandwidth of upper $k_n$ concomitants of $X$ (dash) and $h_n =\sqrt{\log(k_{n})/n}$ (solid).
  • Figure 3: Top panels: Bias. Bottom panels: MSE. Sample sizes $n = 10^3, 10^{4}$ in solid and dashed, respectively; number of simulations is $N = 500$. We consider the CSGMS model (low dependence (far left) and high dependence (center left)), and the conditional Fréchet model constructed from an underlying ARFIMA process (low dependence (center right) and high dependence (far right)).
  • Figure 4: Log-returns of the WTI spot price (top) and oil volatility index CBOE OVX (bottom) from 2007 to end of 2024.
  • Figure 5: Left panels: Pareto QQ-plots of the negative (top) and positive (bottom) WTI log-returns subsampled on uniformly transformed values of OVX in the intervals $\{[0.01, 0.03], [0.49, 0.51], [0.96, 0.98]\}$ in dashed, long-dashed and solid respectively. Four right panels: Auto-correlation plots (left) and partial auto-correlation plots (right) of the negative (red) and positive (blue) of CBOE OVX data (top) and WTI log-returns (bottom).
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (79)

  • Example
  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Proposition 1
  • Theorem 3
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Theorem 4
  • Theorem 5
  • Remark
  • ...and 69 more