Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Penrose Tiled Low-Rank Compression and Section-Wise Q&A Fine-Tuning: A General Framework for Domain-Specific Large Language Model Adaptation

Chuan-Wei Kuo, Siyu Chen, Chenqi Yan, Yu Yang Fredrik Liu

TL;DR

This paper tackles the problem of efficiently adapting extremely large language models to data-scarce, knowledge-dense domains such as materials science. It introduces a two-stage framework that first performs Penrose-tiled low-rank decomposition of weight matrices followed by frequency-domain pruning with KL-divergence-based distribution alignment, and then applies a section-wise Q&A fine-tuning regimen to inject domain knowledge while mitigating forgetting. The core contributions are the Penrose-tiled rank-block decomposition, spectral-domain compression with representation-alignment, and a reading-style adaptation strategy that progresses through document sections to build domain understanding. The approach aims to deliver domain-specialized LLMs that retain general language capabilities with lower computational and data requirements, enabling practical deployment in scientific domains. The paper outlines a principled experimental plan in materials science, addressing both compression fidelity and interpretable knowledge integration, and highlights broad opportunities for extensions to other fields with similar data-scarcity and knowledge-density characteristics.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for specialized scientific domains such as materials science, yet adapting them efficiently and accurately to domain-specific knowledge remains challenging due to limited data and high knowledge density. We propose a two-stage framework that combines structured model compression with a scientific fine-tuning regimen to address this challenge. In the compression stage, we decompose the LLM's weight matrices into local low-rank "rank blocks" and arrange these blocks in a Penrose-like non-periodic tiling pattern. Each block is then compacted via spectral transformations (e.g., discrete cosine or Fourier transforms), and a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence-based alignment loss preserves the distributional similarity between the compressed model's representations and those of the original full model. In the adaptation stage, the compressed model is further tuned using a human-like scientific reading protocol: it processes technical materials science documents section by section, engaging in a structured question-and-answer routine for each section. This section-wise Q&A fine-tuning strategy extracts explicit reasoning traces and gradually injects domain knowledge, while minimizing catastrophic forgetting of the model's general language capabilities. By balancing efficient compression with targeted adaptation, our two-stage approach enables precise specialization of LLMs to high-value domains under data-scarce conditions. We present this principled yet exploratory pipeline and outline its potential for advancing materials science knowledge integration, laying the groundwork for comprehensive empirical evaluation in future work.

Penrose Tiled Low-Rank Compression and Section-Wise Q&A Fine-Tuning: A General Framework for Domain-Specific Large Language Model Adaptation

TL;DR

This paper tackles the problem of efficiently adapting extremely large language models to data-scarce, knowledge-dense domains such as materials science. It introduces a two-stage framework that first performs Penrose-tiled low-rank decomposition of weight matrices followed by frequency-domain pruning with KL-divergence-based distribution alignment, and then applies a section-wise Q&A fine-tuning regimen to inject domain knowledge while mitigating forgetting. The core contributions are the Penrose-tiled rank-block decomposition, spectral-domain compression with representation-alignment, and a reading-style adaptation strategy that progresses through document sections to build domain understanding. The approach aims to deliver domain-specialized LLMs that retain general language capabilities with lower computational and data requirements, enabling practical deployment in scientific domains. The paper outlines a principled experimental plan in materials science, addressing both compression fidelity and interpretable knowledge integration, and highlights broad opportunities for extensions to other fields with similar data-scarcity and knowledge-density characteristics.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for specialized scientific domains such as materials science, yet adapting them efficiently and accurately to domain-specific knowledge remains challenging due to limited data and high knowledge density. We propose a two-stage framework that combines structured model compression with a scientific fine-tuning regimen to address this challenge. In the compression stage, we decompose the LLM's weight matrices into local low-rank "rank blocks" and arrange these blocks in a Penrose-like non-periodic tiling pattern. Each block is then compacted via spectral transformations (e.g., discrete cosine or Fourier transforms), and a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence-based alignment loss preserves the distributional similarity between the compressed model's representations and those of the original full model. In the adaptation stage, the compressed model is further tuned using a human-like scientific reading protocol: it processes technical materials science documents section by section, engaging in a structured question-and-answer routine for each section. This section-wise Q&A fine-tuning strategy extracts explicit reasoning traces and gradually injects domain knowledge, while minimizing catastrophic forgetting of the model's general language capabilities. By balancing efficient compression with targeted adaptation, our two-stage approach enables precise specialization of LLMs to high-value domains under data-scarce conditions. We present this principled yet exploratory pipeline and outline its potential for advancing materials science knowledge integration, laying the groundwork for comprehensive empirical evaluation in future work.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 58 sections, 5 equations.