JEEM: Vision-Language Understanding in Four Arabic Dialects
Karima Kadaoui, Hanin Atwany, Hamdan Al-Ali, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Ali Mekky, Sergei Tilga, Natalia Fedorova, Ekaterina Artemova, Hanan Aldarmaki, Yova Kementchedjhieva
TL;DR
JEEM presents a culturally informed vision-language benchmark for four Arabic dialects (Jordanian, Egyptian, Emirati, and Moroccan) to evaluate image captioning and visual question answering. It details a rigorous data-collection pipeline with native-dialect annotation, dialect-first captions, and dialect-specific QA, complemented by cross-dialect shared content. The study benchmarks several Arabic VLMs and GPT-4o using traditional, GPT-based, and human evaluations, revealing persistent gaps in dialectal understanding and cultural grounding, even for strong models like GPT-4o. Key findings show open-source models lag behind GPT-4o in most metrics, with dialect-resource disparities (notably Emirati) driving performance differences, underscoring the need for more inclusive, dialect-aware training and evaluation. JEEM provides a framework for culturally diverse assessment and highlights practical implications for deploying VLMs in Arabic-speaking regions.
Abstract
We introduce JEEM, a benchmark designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on visual understanding across four Arabic-speaking countries: Jordan, The Emirates, Egypt, and Morocco. JEEM includes the tasks of image captioning and visual question answering, and features culturally rich and regionally diverse content. This dataset aims to assess the ability of VLMs to generalize across dialects and accurately interpret cultural elements in visual contexts. In an evaluation of five prominent open-source Arabic VLMs and GPT-4V, we find that the Arabic VLMs consistently underperform, struggling with both visual understanding and dialect-specific generation. While GPT-4V ranks best in this comparison, the model's linguistic competence varies across dialects, and its visual understanding capabilities lag behind. This underscores the need for more inclusive models and the value of culturally-diverse evaluation paradigms.
