Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Minimal generating sets of large powers of bivariate monomial ideals

Jutta Rath, Roswitha Rissner

TL;DR

The authors address the problem of understanding minimal generating sets for large powers of bivariate monomial ideals. By introducing persistent generators and the link operation, they show that beyond an explicit bound s, powers I^{s+ℓ} can be assembled from stable components derived from I^s, yielding explicit descriptions of G(I^{s+ℓ}) and a linear growth of μ(I^n). They develop the ABH decomposition for regular staircase factors and prove that large powers admit an O(ℓ) update mechanism, enabling efficient computation via SageMath. The approach is complemented by practical runtime benchmarks demonstrating significant speedups over standard exponentiation in Macaulay2. Overall, the work provides both theoretical insight into the structure of high powers and practical algorithms for fast computation of minimal generators and their counts.

Abstract

It is known that for a monomial ideal $I$, the number of minimal generators, $μ(I^n)$, eventually follows a polynomial pattern for increasing $n$. In general, little is known about the power at which this pattern emerges. Even less is known about the exact form of the minimal generators after this power. Let $s\ge μ(I)(d^2-1)+1$, where $d$ is a constant bounded above by the maximal $x$- or $y$-degree appearing in the set $\mathsf{G}(I)$ of minimal generators of $I$. We show that every higher power $I^{s+\ell}$ for any $\ell \ge 0$ can be constructed from certain subideals of $I^s$. This provides an explicit description of~$\mathsf{G}(I^{s+\ell})$ in terms of $\mathsf{G}(I^s)$. Given $\mathsf{G}(I^s)$, this construction significantly reduces computational complexity in determining larger powers of~$I$. This further enables us to explicitly compute $μ(I^n)$ for all $n\ge s$ in terms of a linear polynomial in $n$. We include runtime measurements for the attached implementation in SageMath.

Minimal generating sets of large powers of bivariate monomial ideals

TL;DR

The authors address the problem of understanding minimal generating sets for large powers of bivariate monomial ideals. By introducing persistent generators and the link operation, they show that beyond an explicit bound s, powers I^{s+ℓ} can be assembled from stable components derived from I^s, yielding explicit descriptions of G(I^{s+ℓ}) and a linear growth of μ(I^n). They develop the ABH decomposition for regular staircase factors and prove that large powers admit an O(ℓ) update mechanism, enabling efficient computation via SageMath. The approach is complemented by practical runtime benchmarks demonstrating significant speedups over standard exponentiation in Macaulay2. Overall, the work provides both theoretical insight into the structure of high powers and practical algorithms for fast computation of minimal generators and their counts.

Abstract

It is known that for a monomial ideal , the number of minimal generators, , eventually follows a polynomial pattern for increasing . In general, little is known about the power at which this pattern emerges. Even less is known about the exact form of the minimal generators after this power. Let , where is a constant bounded above by the maximal - or -degree appearing in the set of minimal generators of . We show that every higher power for any can be constructed from certain subideals of . This provides an explicit description of~ in terms of . Given , this construction significantly reduces computational complexity in determining larger powers of~. This further enables us to explicitly compute for all in terms of a linear polynomial in . We include runtime measurements for the attached implementation in SageMath.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 18 theorems, 109 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 2.11

Let $f$, $g$, $h\in \mathsf{k}[x,y]$ be monomials such that $f$ lies between $g$ and $h$. Then the following assertions are equivalent: Moreover, $\deg_{g,h}(f) = \mathsf{d}_{g,h}$ implies $f \in \mathsf{G}(\overline{(g,h)})$.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Visualization of the ideal link
  • Figure 2: Left: The integral closure of $(x^a, y^b)$ adds all lattice points above the line connecting $(a,0)$ and $(0,b)$ (red). Right: Visualization of Fact \ref{['fact:ic']}(2).
  • Figure 3:
  • Figure 4: We partition $(x^u,y^v)^nJ$ into sections based on the $y$-degree (indicated by dashed lines). Additionally, note that the upper left corner of each rectangle is in $(x^u,y^v)^nJ$ (since we assumed $J$ to be anchored). This bounds the $x$-degree in each $y$-section; see Remark \ref{['remark:y-sections-and-x-degree']}.
  • Figure 5: Visualization of the sets $L$, $M$, and $R$ in Example \ref{['example:1']}.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (77)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.5
  • Remark 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • Remark 2.8
  • Definition 2.9
  • Remark 2.10
  • Lemma 2.11
  • proof
  • ...and 67 more