Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hereditary classes of graphs and matroids with finitely many exclusions

Jagdeep Singh, Vaidy Sivaraman

TL;DR

The article extends the study of hereditary graph classes by proving that the edge-add operation preserves finiteness of forbidden induced subgraphs: if a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$ has finitely many forbidden subgraphs, then $\mathcal{G}^{\mathrm{add}}$ does as well, with further implications for classes formed by bounded edge/vertex modifications. It provides explicit finite forbidden subgraph lists for edge-add split graphs and edge-add threshold graphs (and, via complementation, for their edge-apex counterparts), and introduces $(p,q)$-edge-split graphs and edge-add chordal graphs with corresponding finiteness results. The paper also establishes matching results in the binary/ternary matroid setting, giving rank-based bounds for forbidden flats in $\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{add}}$ and developing a projective-geometry representation via 2-colorings to prove these bounds. Collectively, the work strengthens Gyárfás-style finiteness results across graph and matroid settings and provides practical templates (lists of forbidden subgraphs and structural decompositions) for recognizing near-membership in these augmented hereditary classes.

Abstract

A class $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs closed under taking induced subgraphs is called hereditary. We denote by $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{add}$ the class of graphs at most one edge addition away from $\mathcal{G}$, and by $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{epex}$ the class of graphs at most one edge deletion away. We previously showed that if $\mathcal{G}$ has finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs, then so does the hereditary class $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{epex}$. In this paper, we prove the corresponding result for $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{add}$. Consequently, we show that the class of graphs within a fixed number of vertex deletions, edge deletions, and edge additions from $\mathcal{G}$ also has finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs provided that $\mathcal{G}$ does. We also present the binary and ternary matroid analogue of this result. Additionally, if $\mathcal{G}$ is closed under complementation, the forbidden induced subgraphs of $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{add}$ and $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{epex}$ are complements of each other. We provide explicit lists of the forbidden induced subgraphs for $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{add}$, and consequently for $\mathcal{G}^\mathrm{epex}$, when $\mathcal{G}$ is the class of split graphs, cographs, or threshold graphs. Following Gyárfás's framework, we introduce $(p,q)$-edge split graphs, analogous to his $(p,q)$-split graphs, and prove they have finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs.

Hereditary classes of graphs and matroids with finitely many exclusions

TL;DR

The article extends the study of hereditary graph classes by proving that the edge-add operation preserves finiteness of forbidden induced subgraphs: if a hereditary class has finitely many forbidden subgraphs, then does as well, with further implications for classes formed by bounded edge/vertex modifications. It provides explicit finite forbidden subgraph lists for edge-add split graphs and edge-add threshold graphs (and, via complementation, for their edge-apex counterparts), and introduces -edge-split graphs and edge-add chordal graphs with corresponding finiteness results. The paper also establishes matching results in the binary/ternary matroid setting, giving rank-based bounds for forbidden flats in and developing a projective-geometry representation via 2-colorings to prove these bounds. Collectively, the work strengthens Gyárfás-style finiteness results across graph and matroid settings and provides practical templates (lists of forbidden subgraphs and structural decompositions) for recognizing near-membership in these augmented hereditary classes.

Abstract

A class of graphs closed under taking induced subgraphs is called hereditary. We denote by the class of graphs at most one edge addition away from , and by the class of graphs at most one edge deletion away. We previously showed that if has finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs, then so does the hereditary class . In this paper, we prove the corresponding result for . Consequently, we show that the class of graphs within a fixed number of vertex deletions, edge deletions, and edge additions from also has finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs provided that does. We also present the binary and ternary matroid analogue of this result. Additionally, if is closed under complementation, the forbidden induced subgraphs of and are complements of each other. We provide explicit lists of the forbidden induced subgraphs for , and consequently for , when is the class of split graphs, cographs, or threshold graphs. Following Gyárfás's framework, we introduce -edge split graphs, analogous to his -split graphs, and prove they have finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 32 theorems, 6 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a hereditary class of graphs such that $\mathcal{G}$ has a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs. Then the edge-apex class of $\mathcal{G}$ is hereditary and also has a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: The $5$-vertex forbidden induced subgraphs for edge-add split graphs.
  • Figure 2: The $6$-vertex forbidden induced subgraphs for edge-add split graphs.
  • Figure 3: The $7$-vertex and $8$-vertex forbidden induced subgraphs for edge-add split graphs.
  • Figure 4: The forbidden induced subgraphs for edge-add threshold graphs.
  • Figure 5: $6$-vertex and $7$-vertex forbidden induced subgraphs for edge-add chordal graphs.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (43)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Corollary 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Corollary 1.7
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • ...and 33 more