Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Synthesis of Single Qutrit Circuits from Clifford+R

Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, Diyi Liu, Edison M. Murairi, Shuchen Zhu

TL;DR

Two deterministic algorithms to approximate single-qutrit gates using the Clifford + $\mathbf{R}$ group to find the best approximation of diagonal rotations are presented.

Abstract

We present two deterministic algorithms to approximate single-qutrit gates. These algorithms utilize the Clifford + $\mathbf{R}$ group to find the best approximation of diagonal rotations. The first algorithm exhaustively searches over the group; while the second algorithm searches only for Householder reflections. The exhaustive search algorithm yields an average $\mathbf{R}$ count of $2.193(11) + 8.621(7) \log_{10}(1 / \varepsilon)$, albeit with a time complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-4.4})$. The Householder search algorithm results in a larger average $\mathbf{R}$ count of $3.20(13) + 10.77(3) \log_{10}(1 / \varepsilon)$ at a reduced time complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-0.42})$, greatly extending the reach in $\varepsilon$. These costs correspond asymptotically to 35% and 69% more non-Clifford gates compared to synthesizing the same unitary with two qubits. Such initial results are encouraging for using the $\mathbf{R}$ gate as the non-transversal gate for qutrit-based computation.

Synthesis of Single Qutrit Circuits from Clifford+R

TL;DR

Two deterministic algorithms to approximate single-qutrit gates using the Clifford + group to find the best approximation of diagonal rotations are presented.

Abstract

We present two deterministic algorithms to approximate single-qutrit gates. These algorithms utilize the Clifford + group to find the best approximation of diagonal rotations. The first algorithm exhaustively searches over the group; while the second algorithm searches only for Householder reflections. The exhaustive search algorithm yields an average count of , albeit with a time complexity of . The Householder search algorithm results in a larger average count of at a reduced time complexity of , greatly extending the reach in . These costs correspond asymptotically to 35% and 69% more non-Clifford gates compared to synthesizing the same unitary with two qubits. Such initial results are encouraging for using the gate as the non-transversal gate for qutrit-based computation.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 1 theorem, 62 equations, 2 figures, 3 algorithms.

Key Result

Lemma 1

For $\mathbf{y} \in \mathcal{D}(\mathbf{u}, f, \varepsilon)$, $|y_4| \leq \sqrt{r^2_2 - r^2_1}$.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Search regions for: (left) Exhaustive Search Algorithm. The search regions of Eq. (\ref{['eq:approx-constraints-full-search']}) are: the blue corresponds to $x^\prime_1$; the green region corresponds to $y^\prime_2$ and the orange region corresponds to $z^\prime_3$; (right) Householder Search Algorithm. $\mathbf{u} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\cos\theta/2, \sin\theta/2, -1, 0)^T$. The yellow region corresponds to the search region in Eq. (\ref{['eq:approx-lattice-version']}).
  • Figure 2: Scaling of the number of non-Clifford gates, $N_{\mathcal{G}}$ ($\mathbf{T}$ or $\mathbf{R}$ depending on qudit dimension) against the infidelity $\varepsilon$. Angles are uniformly sampled in the region $\theta\in(-\pi/2 , \pi/2)$.

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Lemma 1
  • proof