Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Small-Mass Asymptotics of Massive Point Vortex Dynamics in Bose--Einstein Condensates

Tomoki Ohsawa, Andrea Richaud

TL;DR

This work analyzes the dynamics of massive point vortices in immiscible two-component Bose–Einstein condensates in the small-mass limit $\varepsilon\to0$. Using a geometric framework, it identifies a kinematic subspace $\mathcal{K}$ on which the massive system projects to the massless Kirchhoff equations, proving that the massive trajectory remains $O(\varepsilon)$-close to $\mathcal{K}$ for short times and deriving a rigorous Gronwall-type bound for the deviation. It additionally derives a first-order correction to the massless dynamics and develops an inner (initial-layer) analysis with a time rescaling $T=t/\varepsilon$ to capture fast inertial oscillations when initial data lie off $\mathcal{K}$, showing the 0th-order inner problem is solvable and the 1st-order correction is integrable by quadrature. Collectively, these results quantify when inertial effects matter for vortex motion, provide practical approximations for realistic BEC systems, and offer a framework for comparing massless vortex models with inertial corrections across short and early-time dynamics.

Abstract

We perform an asymptotic analysis of the massive point vortex dynamics in Bose--Einstein condensates in the small-mass limit $\varepsilon \to 0$. We show that the orthogonal projection of the massive dynamics to a certain subspace $\mathcal{K}$ (called kinematic subspace) in the phase space yields the standard massless vortex dynamics or the Kirchhoff equations. We show that the massless dynamics is the zeroth-order approximation to the massive equation as $\varepsilon \to 0$, and also derive a first-order correction to the zeroth-order massless dynamics. The massive dynamics near $\mathcal{K}$ is well approximated by the corresponding massless dynamics. In fact, our main result proves that the massive dynamics starting in $\mathcal{K}$ stays $O(\varepsilon)$-close to $\mathcal{K}$ for short time. On the other hand, the massive dynamics starting outside $\mathcal{K}$ exhibits an oscillatory initial layer due to its inertia and deviates significantly from the massless dynamics. We also perform an asymptotic analysis with a rescaled time to derive the inner approximation to capture the initial layer. The 0th-order inner equations are exactly solvable, and the 1st-order inner equations can be solved by quadrature. The combined inner approximation captures the initial oscillatory layer of the massive dynamics.

Small-Mass Asymptotics of Massive Point Vortex Dynamics in Bose--Einstein Condensates

TL;DR

This work analyzes the dynamics of massive point vortices in immiscible two-component Bose–Einstein condensates in the small-mass limit . Using a geometric framework, it identifies a kinematic subspace on which the massive system projects to the massless Kirchhoff equations, proving that the massive trajectory remains -close to for short times and deriving a rigorous Gronwall-type bound for the deviation. It additionally derives a first-order correction to the massless dynamics and develops an inner (initial-layer) analysis with a time rescaling to capture fast inertial oscillations when initial data lie off , showing the 0th-order inner problem is solvable and the 1st-order correction is integrable by quadrature. Collectively, these results quantify when inertial effects matter for vortex motion, provide practical approximations for realistic BEC systems, and offer a framework for comparing massless vortex models with inertial corrections across short and early-time dynamics.

Abstract

We perform an asymptotic analysis of the massive point vortex dynamics in Bose--Einstein condensates in the small-mass limit . We show that the orthogonal projection of the massive dynamics to a certain subspace (called kinematic subspace) in the phase space yields the standard massless vortex dynamics or the Kirchhoff equations. We show that the massless dynamics is the zeroth-order approximation to the massive equation as , and also derive a first-order correction to the zeroth-order massless dynamics. The massive dynamics near is well approximated by the corresponding massless dynamics. In fact, our main result proves that the massive dynamics starting in stays -close to for short time. On the other hand, the massive dynamics starting outside exhibits an oscillatory initial layer due to its inertia and deviates significantly from the massless dynamics. We also perform an asymptotic analysis with a rescaled time to derive the inner approximation to capture the initial layer. The 0th-order inner equations are exactly solvable, and the 1st-order inner equations can be solved by quadrature. The combined inner approximation captures the initial oscillatory layer of the massive dynamics.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 sections, 2 theorems, 98 equations, 21 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1

Let $g$ be the standard metric on $T^{*}\mathbb{R}^{2N}$, i.e., and consider the Hamiltonian vector field $X_{H}$ on $T^{*}\mathbb{R}^{2N}$ (from eq:X_H) for the massive vortex dynamics eq:Hamilton as well as the Hamiltonian vector field $X_{E}$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2N}$ (from eq:X_E) for the massless vortex dynamics eq:Kirchhoff. Then the orthogonal projection of $X

Figures (21)

  • Figure 1: Subspace $\mathcal{K}$ and tangent vectors $v_{j}, w_{j} \in T_{\varphi(\mathbf{r})}\mathcal{K}$ forming a basis $\{ v_{j}, w_{j} \}_{j=1}^{N}$ for $T_{\varphi(\mathbf{r})}\mathcal{K}$. Note that, strictly speaking, the tangent vectors in the figure live in tangent spaces of $\mathbb{R}^{2N}$ and $\mathcal{K}$ but are drawn in the base spaces for simplicity.
  • Figure 2: Orthogonally projecting $X_{H}$---the vector field defining the massive point vortex equation \ref{['eq:Hamilton']}---from the tangent space of $T^{*}\mathbb{R}^{2N}$ to the tangent space of $\mathcal{K}$ defines vector field $\mathcal{P}(X_{H})$ on $\mathcal{K}$; this in turn corresponds via $\varphi$ to vector field $X_{E}$ on $\mathbb{R}^{2N}$ defining the Kirchhoff equation \ref{['eq:Kirchhoff']}.
  • Figure 3: $x$-coordinate of vortex 1
  • Figure 4: $y$-coordinate of vortex 1
  • Figure 6: $x$-coordinate of vortex 2
  • ...and 16 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Remark 1
  • Proposition
  • proof
  • Theorem
  • proof