Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Axiomatizing small varieties of periodic l-pregroups

Nikolaos Galatos, Simon Santschi

TL;DR

The paper advances the axiomatization and structural understanding of small, periodic ℓ-pregroup varieties generated by the $n$-periodic family $ extbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z})$. It establishes that the subvariety $ extbf{V}( extbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z}))$ is defined inside the LP$_n$-theory by a single equation $x \sigma(y)^n hickapprox \sigma(y)^n x$, with $\sigma(y)=y igwedge y^{[1]} igwedge \cdots igwedge y^{[n-1]}$, and analyzes its finitely generated FSIs as exactly the nontrivial $n$-periodic ℓ-pregroups whose group skeleton is totally ordered. The work also describes how FSIs not ℓ-groups decompose as lexicographic products of a finitely generated totally ordered abelian ℓ-group with $ extbf{F}_k(\mathbb{Z})$ for $kigm| n$, and characterizes the lattice of all finite joins of these varieties as the finite downset lattice of divisors of $n$, yielding a complete lattice-theoretic picture. The combination of wreath-product representations, convex subalgebra theory, and lexicographic constructions provides a robust toolkit for understanding $n$-periodic ℓ-pregroups and their residuated-like logics, with precise axiomatizations and a clear description of the subvariety lattice structure.

Abstract

We provide an axiomatization for the variety generated by the $n$-periodic l-pregroup $\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z})$, for every $n \in \mathbb{Z}^+$, as well as for all possible joins of such varieties; the finite joins form an ideal in the subvariety lattice of l-pregroups and we describe fully its lattice structure. On the way, we characterize all finitely subdirectly irreducible (FSI) algebras in the variety generated by $\mathbf{F}_n(\mathbb{Z})$ as the $n$-periodic l-pregroups that have a totally ordered group skeleton (and are not trivial). The finitely generated FSIs that are not l-groups are further characterized as lexicographic products of a (finitely generated) totally ordered abelian l-group and $\mathbf{F}_k(\mathbb{Z})$, where $k \mid n$.

Axiomatizing small varieties of periodic l-pregroups

TL;DR

The paper advances the axiomatization and structural understanding of small, periodic ℓ-pregroup varieties generated by the -periodic family . It establishes that the subvariety is defined inside the LP-theory by a single equation , with , and analyzes its finitely generated FSIs as exactly the nontrivial -periodic ℓ-pregroups whose group skeleton is totally ordered. The work also describes how FSIs not ℓ-groups decompose as lexicographic products of a finitely generated totally ordered abelian ℓ-group with for , and characterizes the lattice of all finite joins of these varieties as the finite downset lattice of divisors of , yielding a complete lattice-theoretic picture. The combination of wreath-product representations, convex subalgebra theory, and lexicographic constructions provides a robust toolkit for understanding -periodic ℓ-pregroups and their residuated-like logics, with precise axiomatizations and a clear description of the subvariety lattice structure.

Abstract

We provide an axiomatization for the variety generated by the -periodic l-pregroup , for every , as well as for all possible joins of such varieties; the finite joins form an ideal in the subvariety lattice of l-pregroups and we describe fully its lattice structure. On the way, we characterize all finitely subdirectly irreducible (FSI) algebras in the variety generated by as the -periodic l-pregroups that have a totally ordered group skeleton (and are not trivial). The finitely generated FSIs that are not l-groups are further characterized as lexicographic products of a (finitely generated) totally ordered abelian l-group and , where .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 73 theorems, 65 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

$\ell$-pregroups are exactly the involutive residuated lattices that satisfy $x+y \approx xy$. Hence, they also satisfy $(xy)^r \approx y^rx^r$, $(xy)^\ell \approx y^\ell x^\ell$, and for all $a,b,c$ the latter is called residuation. Also, multiplication distributes over both joins and meets, and the De Morgan laws hold: $(x\mathbin{\vee} y)^r \approx x^r \mathbin{\wedge} y^r$, $(x\mathbin{\wedge}

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: An illustration of a function $f$ in $\mathbf F_2(\mathbb{Z})$, of $\sigma_2(f)=f \mathbin{\wedge} f^{\ell \ell}$ (the largest invertible element below $f$) and of $\sigma(f)^{-1}f$ (the associated strictly positive flat element).
  • Figure 2: For $f \in \mathbf F_6(\mathbb{Z})$, we have $f^{[l]}(0) > 0$ iff $l \in \{0,2,3,5\}=P_f$, so $\mathop{\mathrm{\lambda}}\nolimits(f) = \bigwedge_{l\in P_f} f^{[l]}$ is shown in the figure.
  • Figure 3: The points $p$ and $q$ for $\mathop{\mathrm{\lambda}}\nolimits(a)$.
  • Figure 4: The map $a\in \mathrm{F}_6(\mathbb{Z})$ has final periodicity $3$, but we have $a(3) < a(0)+3$. Therefore we can generate the positive flat map $c$ with final periodicity $6$.
  • Figure 5: An element $f$ of $\mathbf F_2(\mathbb{Q} \overrightarrow{\times} \mathbb{Z})$, its global component $\widetilde{f} \in \mathbf F_1(\mathbb{Z})$, and two of its local components $\overline{f}_0, \overline{f}_1 \in \mathbf F_2(\mathbb{Z})$.

Theorems & Definitions (145)

  • Lemma 2.1: GJGJKO
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3: Lemma 2.6(1) of GG2
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Remark 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • proof
  • Remark 2.7
  • proof
  • ...and 135 more