Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Riesz Transform Characterizations of $H^1$ and {\rm BMO} on Ahlfors Regular Sets with Small Oscillations

Dorina Mitrea, Irina Mitrea, Marius Mitrea

TL;DR

The paper develops Riesz-transform characterizations of the endpoint spaces $H^1$ and ${\rm BMO}$ on Ahlfors regular sets with small oscillations, generalizing Fefferman–Stein type results from flat Euclidean space to geometric contexts with UR boundaries. By employing distributional and principal-value Riesz transforms, along with the Clifford-algebra/Cauchy–Clifford framework, the authors prove that on infinitesimally flat AR domains (and their δ-AR extensions) the Hardy space on the boundary satisfies $H^1(\partial\Omega,\sigma)=\{f\in L^1: R_j f \in L^1, \ 1\le j \le n\}$ and ${\rm BMO}(\partial\Omega,\sigma)$ admits a Fefferman–Stein type representation $f_0+\sum_j R_j f_j$ with $f_0,f_j\in L^{\infty}$. They treat both domains with compact boundaries and those with unbounded boundaries, building Green functions, non-tangential boundary traces, and Dirichlet problem solvability in $L^p$-settings, and they extend the results to the δ-AR regime (small oscillation of the normal) and to UR unbounded boundaries. The work provides a natural maximal/minimality interpretation for $H^1$ and ${\rm BMO}$ in this rough setting and yields a robust framework for boundary value problems on rough, low-regularity interfaces.

Abstract

We employ the Riesz transform as a means for describing geometric properties of sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$, and study the extent to which they can be used to characterize function spaces defined on said sets. In particular, characterizations of the end-point spaces on the Lebesgue scale $L^p$ with $1<p<\infty$, namely the Hardy space $H^1$ and the John-Nirenberg space {\rm BMO}, are produced in terms of the Riesz transforms on Ahlfors regular sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^n$ with small oscillations (quantified in terms of the {\rm BMO} nature of the outward unit normal). These generalize the celebrated results of C.~Fefferman and E.~Stein in the flat Euclidean setting.

Riesz Transform Characterizations of $H^1$ and {\rm BMO} on Ahlfors Regular Sets with Small Oscillations

TL;DR

The paper develops Riesz-transform characterizations of the endpoint spaces and on Ahlfors regular sets with small oscillations, generalizing Fefferman–Stein type results from flat Euclidean space to geometric contexts with UR boundaries. By employing distributional and principal-value Riesz transforms, along with the Clifford-algebra/Cauchy–Clifford framework, the authors prove that on infinitesimally flat AR domains (and their δ-AR extensions) the Hardy space on the boundary satisfies and admits a Fefferman–Stein type representation with . They treat both domains with compact boundaries and those with unbounded boundaries, building Green functions, non-tangential boundary traces, and Dirichlet problem solvability in -settings, and they extend the results to the δ-AR regime (small oscillation of the normal) and to UR unbounded boundaries. The work provides a natural maximal/minimality interpretation for and in this rough setting and yields a robust framework for boundary value problems on rough, low-regularity interfaces.

Abstract

We employ the Riesz transform as a means for describing geometric properties of sets in , and study the extent to which they can be used to characterize function spaces defined on said sets. In particular, characterizations of the end-point spaces on the Lebesgue scale with , namely the Hardy space and the John-Nirenberg space {\rm BMO}, are produced in terms of the Riesz transforms on Ahlfors regular sets in with small oscillations (quantified in terms of the {\rm BMO} nature of the outward unit normal). These generalize the celebrated results of C.~Fefferman and E.~Stein in the flat Euclidean setting.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 25 theorems, 224 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\Omega\subseteq\mathbb{R}^n$ be an Ahlfors regular domain with compact boundary. Then for each $\alpha\in(0,1)$ the following claims are equivalent:

Theorems & Definitions (47)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • ...and 37 more