SaudiCulture: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models Cultural Competence within Saudi Arabia
Lama Ayash, Hassan Alhuzali, Ashwag Alasmari, Sultan Aloufi
TL;DR
SaudiCulture tackles the gap in LLM cultural competence by introducing a Saudi Arabia–focused benchmark that captures regional diversity across five geographic areas and multiple cultural domains. The dataset contains 441 culturally rich questions, distributed across general and region-specific content, and implemented in open-ended, single-choice, and multi-answer formats to probe both generative and discriminative capabilities. Evaluations of five LLMs, including GPT-4 and Arabic-centric models, reveal systematic regional and format-dependent performance declines, with open-ended and multi-answer queries proving the most challenging. The work demonstrates the need for region-aware training data and knowledge representations, and positions SaudiCulture as a foundation for future research aimed at building more culturally aware and globally equitable AI systems.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing; however, they often struggle to accurately capture and reflect cultural nuances. This research addresses this challenge by focusing on Saudi Arabia, a country characterized by diverse dialects and rich cultural traditions. We introduce SaudiCulture, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the cultural competence of LLMs within the distinct geographical and cultural contexts of Saudi Arabia. SaudiCulture is a comprehensive dataset of questions covering five major geographical regions, such as West, East, South, North, and Center, along with general questions applicable across all regions. The dataset encompasses a broad spectrum of cultural domains, including food, clothing, entertainment, celebrations, and crafts. To ensure a rigorous evaluation, SaudiCulture includes questions of varying complexity, such as open-ended, single-choice, and multiple-choice formats, with some requiring multiple correct answers. Additionally, the dataset distinguishes between common cultural knowledge and specialized regional aspects. We conduct extensive evaluations on five LLMs, such as GPT-4, Llama 3.3, FANAR, Jais, and AceGPT, analyzing their performance across different question types and cultural contexts. Our findings reveal that all models experience significant performance declines when faced with highly specialized or region-specific questions, particularly those requiring multiple correct responses. Additionally, certain cultural categories are more easily identifiable than others, further highlighting inconsistencies in LLMs cultural understanding. These results emphasize the importance of incorporating region-specific knowledge into LLMs training to enhance their cultural competence.
